Page 68 - APPENDIX B: Trials Investigating the Management of Acute Radiation-Induced Skin Reactions Reading Qualitative Research
P. 68
68
WOUND CARE
This participant highlighted the presumption of a bolus effect regardless of the type or condition
of dressing that leads to removal prior to radiotherapy and also described a policy change about
leaving dressings on during radiotherapy that is underway at their centre (discussed in more
detail later).
In summary, this section of the survey results showed that there is inconsistency in
practice regarding radiating through wound dressings across Canada with 50% of centres who
always remove and 50% who sometimes remove dressings prior to radiotherapy. The findings
revealed that dressings are not left in place at all times at any of the centres. An analysis of the
explanations provided disclosed that dressings are generally removed for the dosimetric reasons
such as to prevent a bolus effect, however if dressings are thin, they may be radiated through.
Physical factors for dressing removal comprised being too bulky or lifting, whereas other factors
might include “organization policy” or standard practice, prognostic factors or patient preference
(A. Hughes, personal communication, August 29, 2013). Current practices are referred to as
“institutional and traditional practices” (A. Bolderston, personal communication, August 22,
2013).
Clinical decision-making. This section of the survey aimed to find out the nature of
clinical decision-making and to identify wound care guidelines that might be used in practice for
when to remove or radiate through dressings. It was requested that, if possible, the respondents
share an electronic copy of such record for reference. An open text response box was available
to explain any other response.

