Page 26 - juldis2018

MDC BULLETIN
VOL. 14 NO. 2

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Year of complaint: 2015

A complaint was received from Dr R, an Enforcement Officer
FACTS OF THE alleging that Dr.Y, a private dental practitioner, had been prac-
COMPLAINT tising during his suspension period. Dr. Y had been suspended
from practising for a period of three (3) months for not renew-
ing his Annual Practising Certificate (APC) since 2013. Dr R did
the inspection visits at Dr. Y’s clinic and found that Dr. Y was
practising during the suspension period.

FINDINGS OF Based on the oral evidence and supporting documents availa-
THE PRELIMINARY ble, the PIC found that:

INVESTIGATION Dr.Y had been practising during the suspension period.
COMMITTEE (PIC)

Dr.Y has neglected and/or disregarded his professional re-
CHARGE AGAINST sponsibilities by practising during his period of suspension.
THE
In relation to facts alleged, you may be found guilty of infa-
RESPONDENT
mous conduct in a professional respect under section 32(2)
(b) of the Dental Act 1971, which is punishable under Section
33 of the Act.

 Dr. Y explained that he opened the clinic solely to enable
DR. Y’S his staff to rescheduled patients’ appointments. Dr. Y also
EXPLANATION informed the committee that he only opened the clinic for
renovation purposes, and to receive mail and bills.

 In response to the dental treatment records, Dr Y ex-
plained that he noted down the treatment plans for pa-
tients without actually seeing the patient.

The PIC, after deliberation, is of the opinion that Dr. Y had
RECOMMENDATION been practising during his suspension period. The PIC unani-

OF PIC mously agreed and recommends that the Council holds an
inquiry.

The Council, having considered the PIC report, the evidence
VERDICT OF THE adduced and the statement by the practitioner, found the
practitioner guilty of the charge. The practitioner was sus-
COUNCIL
pended for six (6) months with costs of RM5000 under Sec-
tion 33(1)(b).

PAGE 26