Page 348 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 348
2 References
chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central 42. Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, et al. Complications
venous catheter infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1001-1007. and failures of subclavian vein catheterization. N Engl J Med.
27. Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ. Prospective randomized trial 1994;331:1735-1738.
of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for the preven- 43. Gualtieri E, Deppe S, Sipperly ME, et al. Subclavian venous cath-
tion of infection associated with central venous and arterial eterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators
catheters. Lancet. 1991;338:339-343. using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:692-697.
28. Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, et al. Vascular 44. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, et al. Ultrasound guid-
catheter site care: the clinical and economic benefits of chlorhex- ance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis
idine gluconate compared with povidone iodine. Clin Infect Dis. of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:2053-2058.
2003;37:764-771. 45. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the
29. Ho KM, Litton E. Use of the chlorhexidine-impregnated Use of Ultrasound Locating Devices for Placing Central Venous
dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter coloniza- Catheters. London, U.K.: National Institute for Clinical
tion and infection: a meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. Excellence (NICE); 2002. Technology appraisal guidance no. 49.
2006;58:281-287. 46. American College of Surgeons. Statement on recommendations
30. Timsit JF, Schwebel C, Bouadma L, et al. Chlorhexidine- for uniform use of real-time ultrasound guidance for placement
impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for of central venous catheters. American College of Surgeons;
prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults. 2008. http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/statements/st-60.html.
JAMA. 2009;301(12):1231-1241. Accessed February 4, 2011.
31. Crawford AG, Fuhr JP Jr, Rao B. Cost-benefit analysis of 47. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, et al. Risk factors of failure
chlorhexidine gluconate dressing in the prevention of catheter- and immediate complication of subclavian vein catheterization in
related bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1036-1041.
2004;25(8):668-674. 48. Hemmelgarn BR, Moist LM, Lok CE, et al. Prevention of dialy-
32. Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, et al. Prevention of central sis catheter malfunction with recombinant tissue plasminogen
venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile bar- activator. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(4):303-312.
rier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 49. Funaki B. Central venous access: a primer for the diagnostic
1994;15:231-238. radiologist. AJR. 2002;179:309-318.
33. Sherertz RJ, Ely EW, Westbrook DM, et al. Education of phy- 50. Martin T, Fontana G, Olak J, et al. Use of a pleural catheter for
sicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter the management of simple pneumothorax. Chest. 1996;110:
infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:641-648. 1169-1172.
34. Veenstra DL, Saint S, Saha S, Lumley T, Sullivan SD. Efficacy of 51. Collier PE, Blocker SH, Graff DM, et al. Cardiac tamponade
antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing from central venous catheters. Am J Surg. 1998;176:212-214.
catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 52. Booth SA, Norton B, Mulvey DA. Central venous catheterization
1999;281:261-267. and fatal cardiac tamponade. Brit J Anaesth. 2001;87:298-302.
35. Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J, et al. Central venous catheters 53. Rutherford, JS, Merry AF, Occleshaw CJ. Depth of central
coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of venous catheterization: an audit of practice in a cardiac surgical
catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections: a unit. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22:267-271.
randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127: 54. Ely EW, Hite RD, Baker AM, et al. Venous air embolism from
267-274. central venous catheterization: a need for increased physician
36. Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, et al. Prevention of central awareness. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2113-2117.
venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an 55. Chastre J, Cornud F, Bouchama A, et al. Thrombosis as a com-
antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a randomized controlled trial. plication of pulmonary artery catheterization via the internal
Ann Int Med. 1997;127:257-266. jugular vein: prospective evaluation by phlebography. N Engl J
37. Darouiche RO, Raad II, Heard SO, et al. A comparison of two Med. 1982;306:278-281.
antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters: Catheter 56. Koksoy C, Kuzu A, Erden I, et al. The risk factors in central venous
Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1-8. catheter-related thrombosis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65:796-798.
38. Rupp ME, Lisco SJ, Lipsett PA, et al. Effect of a second-genera- 57. Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, et al. Central vein catheter-related
tion venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver thrombosis in intensive care patients: incidence, risk factors, and
sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections. Ann Intern relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest. 1998;114:207-213.
Med. 2005:143:570-580. 58. Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS, Shah H, Ambrosius
39. Casey AL, Mermel LA, Nightingale P, et al. Antimicrobial WT, Kneebone PH. Tunneled infusion catheters: increased inci-
central venous catheters in adults: a systemic review and meta- dence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus
analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:763-776. internal jugular venous access. Radiology. 2000;217:89-93.
40. Cook DJ, Randolph A, Kernerman P, et al. Central venous cath- 59. Macdonald S, Watt AJ, McNally D, Edwards RD, Moss JG.
eter replacement strategies. A systematic review of the literature. Comparison of technical success and outcome of tunneled cath-
Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1417-1424. eters inserted via the jugular and subclavian approaches. J Vasc
41. Safdar N, Kluger DM, Maki DG. A review of risk factors for Interv Radiol. 2000;11:225-231.
catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutane- 60. Maury E, Guglielminotti J, Alzieu M, et al. Ultrasound examina-
ously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters. Medicine. tion. An alternative to chest radiography after central venous
2002;81:466-479. catheter insertion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:403-405.
Section02-O-ref.indd 2 12/10/2014 8:59:25 PM

