Page 511 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill

References 3

Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth. 68. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena
2005;95:746-755. caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated
63. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1734-1739.
variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal 69. Magder S, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in
volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:517-523. right atrial pressure predict the response to fluid challenge.
64. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al. Pulse pressure variation J Crit Care. 1992;7:76-85.
predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass 70. Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. How can the response to
surgery. Chest. 2004;126:1563-1568. volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory
65. Monnet X, Chemla D, Osman D, et al. Measuring aortic diam- movements be predicted? Crit Care. 2006;10:R102.
eter improves accuracy of esophageal Doppler in assessing fluid 71. Bouferrache K, Amiel J-B, Chimot L, et al. Initial resuscitation
responsiveness. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:477-482. guided by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations
66. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Hampole C, et al. Radial artery pulse and early echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamics in
pressure variation correlates with brachial artery peak veloc- intensive care unit septic patients: a pilot study. Crit Care Med.
ity variation in ventilated subjects when measured by internal 2012;40:2821-2827.
medicine residents using hand-carried ultrasound devices.
Chest. 2007;131:1301-1307.
67. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Díaz Monrové JC. Brachial
artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in
mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care. 2009;13:R142.

Section03-O-ref.indd 3 1/20/2015 7:10:22 AM