Page 40 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 40

Psychological Resources  13

           such differences may include factors such as personality and
           psychological resources.


               Psychological Resources

             Psychological resources refer to emotional and cognitive fac-
           tors such as optimism, personal control, social support and
           active coping all of which are known to be protective of men-
           tal health (Taylor et al.   2000 ). Moreover there is evidence
           that the presence of these positive features may also foster
                                                 ;
           good physical health (DeLongis et al.   1988  Schöllgen et al.
             2011 ). Thus the presence of positive psychological resources
           may act as a buffer against the impact of the negative aspects
           of ill health. For example, individuals who seek information
           or advice about their wound and its treatment may find this
           gives them greater personal control of their health and also
           decreases feelings of distress (Moffatt et al.   2011 ). The signifi-
           cance of this personal control for enabling individuals to live
           well with a chronic wound is demonstrated very clearly by
           Probst et al. (  2013 ), who looked at the experience of women
           with fungating wounds. In this study, some of the women had
           been through a very personal process of working out what
           adjustments they needed to make to their lives in order to
           manage their condition so as to enable them to continue to
           live a normal life – going to work, seeing friends and so on.
           These women seemed to have accepted the situation and the
           changes they had had to make to accommodate the person
           they had become. This self-efficacy – the belief that you can
           do something – gave them the ability to adjust to their new
           identity, taking control of the situation, and furthermore,
           insisting that everyone else (including intimate partners) also
           accept this new reality.
               The women in Probst et al.’s study, showed what has been
           termed resilience – they had successfully adapted in order to
           maintain (or regain) their emotional well-being in the face of
           adversity (Trivedi et al.   2011 ).  Traditionally  resilience
           (also sometimes referred to as hardiness) has been linked to
           the coping that is seen in some individuals following trau-
           matic events, disasters or personal tragedy. This model sees
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45