Page 214 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 214

FAMILy HEALTH  n  181



             (c)  cultural  influences,  and  (d)  the  physical,   respond to the increased awareness of risk,
             social, economic, and political environments,   new genetic risk information, or even the ear-
             including resources. researchers have shown   liest occurrence of symptoms. Families may   F
             that health and risk factors cluster in families   need to accept increased surveillance, adhere
             because  members  often  have  similar  diets,   to  changes  in  health  behaviors,  or  accept
             activity  patterns,  and  behaviors,  such  as   interventions that may potentially delay the
             smoking and alcohol abuse as well as a com-  onset or progression of the disease. A genom-
             mon  physical  environment.  Identification   ics context for the health of families can alter
             of health in families has focused on family   lifestyle  and  health  behaviors,  affect  repro-
             interaction patterns, family problem solving,   ductive  decision  making,  alter  family  rela-
             and patterns of responses to changes in the   tionships, and have familial implications.
             family  system.  These  definitions  and  con-  researchers  have  focused  on  family
             cepts of family health provide a framework   responses  to  specific  illnesses  resulting  in
             for  determining  measurable  outcomes  of   a body of literature reporting that the inter-
             family health while also accounting for the   actions  within  the  family  system  affect
             diversity in family structure (Feetham, 1999,   the  health  outcomes  of  family  members.
             2000, 2001).                             research  of  family  responses  to  illness  in
                 In  2003,  we  entered  the  genomic  era,   family members and the role of the family in
             with  findings  from  genomic  research  and   adaptation to illness and recovery provides
             advances in genetic technologies requiring a   further evidence of the importance of family
             reframing of how we think of the continuum   and the health of family members.
             of health and illness, and even the concept of   From  the  time  of  Florence  Nightingale,
             disease. The ways in which diseases are cate-  nurses  have  been  encouraged  to  consider
             gorized, and ultimately how they are treated   family members as important for nursing care
             and  managed,  are  changing  (Feetham  &   (Whall  &  Fawcett,  1991,  p.  9).  However,  the
             Thomson,  2006).  No  longer  named  by  their   interdependence  and  importance  of  health
             symptoms  (such  as  asthma),  diseases  will   and the family is accepted in theory but is not
             be  more  specifically  identified  by  knowing   evident in research. Although our knowledge
             the genetic and environmental causes lead-  of this relationship has increased, it has also
             ing  to  more  focused  treatments  (Hamburg   been  limited  in  that  research  continues  to
             &  Collins,  2010).These  advances  may  affect   focus more on measures of the negative out-
             the  concept  of  family  health.  Individuals   comes (e.g., depression) of illness and injury
             and  families  will  be  faced  with  reframing   on the family and family members. This focus
             their  concept  and  experience  with  diagno-  on the individual as the unit of measure, and
             sis, treatment, and prevention to include the   conducting research of families with physical
             term “genetically linked” disorder, with the   and/or mental pathology, less knowledge has
             blurring  of  the  boundary  between  health   been generated about health, how the family
             and  illness  (Feetham  &  Thomson,  2006).   functions,  and  the  strengths  and  resources
             Genetic information may result in the need   of families responding to acute and chronic
             to extend the concept of “illness time” phases   illness.  Grzywacz  and  Ganong  (2009)  sug-
             to  include  knowledge  of  a  risk  state,  or  in   gest  that  family  research  should  result  in
             some cases, a nonsymptomatic phase with a   knowledge and strategies for protecting and
             knowledge of risk (rolland & Williams, 2005;   promoting health across the life span while
             Street  &  Soldan,  1998).  The  risk  state  refers   distinguishing the interdependence of activ-
             to the time before a statistical risk is known   ities of family to the health of the family and
             or acknowledged or the point in time when   individual  family  members.  Effective  inter-
             symptoms occur. The risk state may require   ventions with families incorporate an under-
             interventions for individuals and families to   standing of what health means to individual
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219