Page 197 - 02 รายงานวิชาการจังหวัดประจวบคีรีขันธ์
P. 197

- 175 -


                   Serizawa, M., 1981, On runoff phenomena during a storm in a small basin of uppermost reach of River
                       Yamaguchi. Hydrology, v. 11, p.8-15.
                   Soeters, R., and van Westen, C. J., 1996, Slope instability recognition, analysis, and zonation: Washington, DC,

                       Transportation Research Board.
                   Suzen, M., and Doyuran, V., 2004, Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical
                       information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment; Turkey: Engineering Geology, v.
                       71, p.303-321.
                   Tangtham, N., 1999, Observed and hypothetical effect over time of the terraced forest plantation on soil and
                       water losses at Doi Angkhang highland project: Chiang Mai.

                   Teerarungsigul, S., 2006, Landslide prediction model using remote sensing, GIS and field geology: a case study
                       of Wang Chin district, Phrae province, Northern Thailand: Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon
                       Ratchasima, 190 p.
                   Thiery, Y., Malet, J. P., Sterlacchini, S., Puissant, A., and Maquaire, O., 2007, Landslide susceptibility assessment
                       by bivariate methods at large scales: Application to a complex mountainous environment:
                       Geomorphology, v. 92, no. 1-2, p.38-59.
                   Trimble, G. R., Hale C. E., and Potter, H. S., 1951, Effect of Soil Cover Condition on Soil-Water Relationhips:
                       Station Paper NE-39. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest
                       Experiment Station, 44 p.

                   Tsukamoto, Y., 1966, Raindrops under forest canopies and splash erosion: Bull Tokyo Univ Agri Tech For, v. 5,
                       p. 65-74.
                   UNISDR., 2004, Living with Risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives Neneva: United Nations, v. 1.
                   Van Den Eeckhaut, Vanwalleghem, M., Peosen, T., Govers, J., Verstraeten, G., Vandekerckhove, G., and
                       Liesbeth, 2006, Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in
                       the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium): Geomorphology, v. 76, no. 3-4, p.392-410.
                   Van Westen, C. J., Castellanos, E., and Kuriakose, S. L., 2008, Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard,

                       and vulnerability assessment: An overview, Engineering Geology, v. 102, no. 3–4, p.112-131.
                   _______________, Quan Luna, B., Vargas Franco, R., Malet, J. P., Jaboyedoff, M., Horton, P., and Kappes, M.,
                       2010, Development of training materials on the use of Geo-information for Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment
                       in a Mountainous Environment, in Proceedings of the Mountain Risks International Conference: Firenze,
                       Italy, 24–26 November 2010, p.469–475.
                   Varnes, D.J., 1978, Slope movement types and processes: Landslides analysis and control special report 176.
                       National Academy of Sciences.
                   _______________, 1984, Landslide Hazard Zonation: a review of principles and practice: UNESCO, Darantiere,
                       Paris, 61 p.

                   Wichai Pantanahiran, 1994, The use of landsat imaery and digital terrain models to assess and predict
                       landslide activity in tropical areas: a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirments for
                       the degree of doctor of philosophy in natural resources, University of Rhode Island, 56 p.
                   Yalcin, A., 2008, GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate
                       statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations: Catena, v. 72, no. 1, p.1-12.
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200