Page 2200 - Williams Hematology ( PDFDrive )
P. 2200

2174  Part XII:  Hemostasis and Thrombosis                            Chapter 126:  von Willebrand Disease           2175




                     Management of AVWS is generally aimed at treating the underly-  influence of other factors in the magnitude of DDAVP effect.  For
                                                                                                                       339
                  ing disorder. VWF levels and bleeding symptoms often improve with   patients requiring repeated infusions of DDAVP, the FVIII activity and
                  successful treatment of hypothyroidism or an associated malignancy.   VWF responses may not be of the same magnitude as after the first
                  Refractory patients  have been treated with glucocorticoids,  plasma   infusion. Although this decay in response has considerable individual
                  exchange, intravenous gamma globulin, rituximab, DDAVP, and VWF-  variability, after one infusion of DDAVP per day for 4 days it was found
                  containing FVIII concentrates. 317,329                that the responses on days 2 to 4 were reduced approximately 30 percent
                                                                        compared to day 1. 336–338,340
                                                                            Therefore, in patients for whom DDAVP is potentially the treat-
                    THERAPY, COURSE, AND PROGNOSIS                      ment of choice, a test dose should be given at the planned therapeutic
                  The mainstays of therapy for VWD are DDAVP, which induces secre-  dose and route in advance of the first required course of treatment with
                  tion of both VWF and FVIII (reviewed in Ref. 330), and replacement   measurements of before and after VWF and FVIII:C levels to ensure
                  therapy with VWF-containing plasma concentrates. The choice of treat-  an adequate therapeutic response. Sampling additional time points
                  ment in any given patient depends upon the type and severity of VWD,   after DDAVP infusion should be considered as some type 1 and type 2
                  the clinical setting, and the type of hemostatic challenge that must be   VWD patients have a significantly shortened VWF half-life and it may
                  met. Type 1 patients are most often treated with DDAVP alone, types   be more appropriate to treat with VWF replacement therapy in clini-
                  2A and 2B with a combination of DDAVP and a VWF-containing FVIII   cal scenarios requiring more durable therapy to maintain hemostasis.
                  product, and type 2N and type 3 patients with VWF-containing con-  For patients with type 1 VWD who are undergoing surgical procedures,
                  centrates.  A previous history of trauma or surgery and the success   DDAVP can be administered 1 hour before surgery and approximately
                         150
                  of previous treatment are important parameters to include in assessing   every 12 hours thereafter for up to two to four doses before loss of clin-
                  the risk of bleeding. Prophylaxis is used in anticipation of hemostatic   ically significant response. Patients should be monitored for response
                  challenges,  such as dental extractions, and is efficacious in preventing   of FVIII and ristocetin cofactor activity and side effects, particularly
                          150
                                                 331
                  recurrent bleeding in severe VWD patients.  Although in general there   hyponatremia (and then should be water restricted), when DDAVP is
                  is a correlation between normal hemostasis and correction of VWF and   administered at frequent intervals. VWF-containing FVIII concentrates
                  FVIII activity, this does not occur in all cases.     should be available for infusion as backup.
                                                                            Approximately 20 to 25 percent of patients with VWD do not
                                                                        respond adequately to DDAVP. Type 2 VWD patients are less likely to
                  DESMOPRESSIN                                          have a response than type 1 patients, 341,335  and virtually no patients with
                  DDAVP is an analogue of antidiuretic hormone that acts through type   type 3 VWD respond. The response to DDAVP of patients with type
                  2 vasopressin receptors to induce secretion of FVIII and VWF, likely via   2A VWD is variable. Although most patients respond only transiently,
                  cyclic adenosine monophosphate–mediated secretion from the Weibel-   some  patients exhibit complete  hemostatic  correction after  DDAVP
                  Palade bodies in endothelial cells.  When DDAVP is administered to   infusion. 342,343  It has been hypothesized that the differences in DDAVP
                                           83
                  healthy subjects, it causes sustained increases of FVIII and ristocetin   efficacy among type 2A patients may correspond to the type of muta-
                  cofactor activity for approximately 4 hours.  Patients with type 1 VWD   tion, with better responses predicted in patients with group 2 mutations.
                                                332
                  treated with DDAVP release unusually high-molecular-weight VWF   A prospective study of the biologic response to DDAVP in well-charac-
                  multimers into the circulation for 1 to 3 hours after the infusion. 332,333    terized VWD patients included type 2A VWD patients with both group
                  Therapy with DDAVP often increases the FVIII activity, VWF:Ag, and   1 and group 2 defects. Although patients with group 2 mutations had
                  ristocetin cofactor activity to two to five times the basal level.  greater improvements in VWF:RCo and shortening of bleeding times
                     DDAVP has become a mainstay for the treatment of mild hemo-  than patients with group 1 defects, neither groups could be classified as
                  philia and VWD  because it is relatively inexpensive, widely avail-  responders. 341
                              334
                  able, and avoids the risks of plasma-derived products. Approximately     Common side effects of DDAVP administration are mild cutane-
                  80 percent of type 1 VWD patients have excellent responses to DDAVP,   ous vasodilation resulting in a feeling of heat, facial flushing, tachycar-
                  although this figure may be substantially lower depending on the cri-  dia, tingling, and headaches. The potential for dilutional hyponatremia,
                  teria for diagnosis and response.  It is regularly used in the setting of   especially in elderly and very young patients and with repeat dosing,
                                         335
                  mild to moderate bleeding and for prophylaxis of patients undergoing   requires appropriate attention to fluid restriction, as it may result in
                  surgical procedures. DDAVP is administered at a dose of 0.3mcg/kg   seizures. There have been isolated reports of acute arterial thrombo-
                  continuous intravenous infusion over 30 minutes. DDAVP is also avail-  sis associated with administration of DDAVP, but the risk appears to
                  able for subcutaneous injection (at the same 0.3mcg/kg dose) and in   be very low when judged against the total number of patients treated.
                  intranasal form (at a fixed dose of 300mcg for adults and 150mcg for   DDAVP is contraindicated in patients with unstable coronary artery
                  children), which appears to be similar in efficacy to intravenous admin-  disease because of increased risk of thrombotic events, such as myocar-
                  istration, 336,337  although the response may be more variable.  dial infarction.  Patients receiving DDAVP at closely spaced intervals
                                                                                   344
                     The response to DDAVP in any given individual with VWD is gen-  of less than 24 to 48 hours can develop tachyphylaxis. 340
                  erally reproducible and predicts response to future doses as long as the   Many experts consider DDAVP to be contraindicated in the treat-
                  follow doses are at least 2 to 4 days later. In one study, 22 type 1 VWD   ment of type 2B VWD, as the high-molecular-weight VWF released
                  patients showed a departure of less than 20 percent from the mean FVIII   from storage sites has an increased affinity for binding to GPIb and
                  peak level calculated from two separate infusions. In addition, the con-  might be expected to induce spontaneous platelet aggregation and wors-
                                                                                           229
                  sistency of response in one patient reliably predicted the future response   ening thrombocytopenia.  However, there are reports of DDAVP used
                  of that patient and other affected family members.  In a study of 77   successfully in type 2B VWD patients, with an associated shortening
                                                       338
                  type 1 VWD patients, DDAVP response was associated both with VWF   of bleeding times and variable thrombocytopenia. 345,346  Although type
                  mutation and baseline multimeric pattern, although subtle abnormali-  2N patients can exhibit increased FVIII:C levels after DDAVP, in some
                  ties in VWF multimers did not preclude a patient response to DDAVP.   cases the FVIII:C levels rapidly decline, likely a result of the absence of
                  Interestingly, patients with the same VWF mutation did not necessar-  stabilizing normal VWF, attenuating clinical efficacy. Type 2M patients
                  ily exhibit the same degree of responsiveness to DDAVP, implying the   generally do not have a satisfactory response to DDAVP. 341,347







          Kaushansky_chapter 126_p2163-2182.indd   2175                                                                 9/21/15   3:15 PM
   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205