Page 102 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3
P. 102

178                                  KAHLE ET AL.



        2. Adjustable TFA Interface. The Infinite Socket™   six study conditions across three repeated indepen-
      is a custom-molded four-strut design combined with   dent utilization periods, each followed by an outcome
      a textile brim and tensioner to contain and control   assessment. The study design controlled for all pros-
      the pelvis and femur and soft tissues across a varying   thetic variables (Table 1), as the subject utilized his
      volume. Adjustments can be made by both clinicians   usual prosthetic components with only the exception
      and patients to manage long-term and daily fluctua-  of the socket (independent variable) throughout the
      tions. The pivoting and sliding connection between   study. The order of testing was randomized using an
      the struts and base provides additional flexibility in   offsite computer randomized number generator to
      adjustability as well as shock absorption and energy   improve methodological quality and minimize bias
      response. The dynamic frame of the Infinite socket™   risk. Further, raters and the study statistician were
      has a textile interface that is reportedly low in friction,   blinded to the independent variables. Data collec-
      anti-microbial, durable, and washable. The Infinite   tion was completed over three sequential days. Each
      Socket™ achieves control and pressure distribution   data collection period began at the same time of day.
      through multiple custom components, which include   The subject was instructed to maintain fluid, salt
      an ischial seat, proximal brim, four struts, and a flex-  intake, and diet over the study period. Weight was
      ible inner distal cup.                        recorded each day, in addition to RL circumference
                                                    measurements, to help ensure volume consistency.
      Study Design                                  A ten-minute rest period between conditions was
        To simulate the same volume fluctuations an ampu-  provided between tests to mitigate confounding from
      tee would experience, three conditions were tested.   fatigue. Blood pressure and heart rate were moni-
      First, to establish a baseline (BASE), the subject was   tored before each test to ensure normalization prior
      casted over his Otto Bock 6Y87 3D TF pin-locking   to re-testing.
      liner (Otto Bock Healthcare, Duderstadt, Germany)
      and a five-ply sock. Both the SOC and Infinite™ sock-  Outcome Measures
      ets were fabricated from this cast. The sockets were     Physical performance measures were selected to
      then fit and adjusted to this configuration to ensure   assess functional capability and safety differences
      an equal baseline. Second, to simulate volume loss   between the two socket conditions. For instance,
      (VLOSS), the five-ply sock was removed from the   speed of movement and walking are valuable clinical
      RL and liner, and then the subject was tested in this   tests of functionality and provide good identification
      condition. This constituted a 2 cm circumferential   of multiple-falls risk (15-17). Slower gait has also been
      volume change (VLOSS) less than the BASE circum-  shown to be an indication of fall risk (18). Thus, the
      ference. Third, to simulate volume gain (VGAIN), the   following tests were selected:
      five-ply sock plus an eight-ply sock was added to the
      RL and liner for a total of 13-ply. This constituted a 2   a.  L-Test: a short walking test with transitional
      cm circumferential volume change (VGAIN) more     movements and multiple turns
      than the BASE circumference.                    b.  Four Square Step Test (4SST): a brief assess-
        An experimental case study design was utilized for     ment of multi-directional stepping (15)
      this project. An independent researcher randomized   c.  Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT): a test to pro-
           Table 1.  Table of Variables
           Table 1. Table of Variables
                 Independent                Dependent                  Controlled
               SOC- IRC TFA          Subjective Response (i.e.,      Accommodation
               Interface              Comfort, Pain)               Clinical Schedule
               LIM -Adjustable TFA      Mobility, i.e., 4SST      Environment
               Interface              Function, i.e., AMP         Knee, Foot, Liner,
                                      Gait Speed, L-Test, 2MWT    Suspension
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107