Page 21 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3
P. 21

TRANSTIBIAL ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS                            97



             AP, Norvell DC, Czerniecki JM. Prosthetic fit-  20.  Hafner B. State of the science evidence report
             ting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb   guidelines. Washington (DC): American Acad-
             amputation: a prospective study. J Rehabil Res   emy of Orthotists & Prosthetists; 2008.
             Dev. 2012;49(10):1493-1504.               21.  Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ. Differences
          11.  Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC. Retro-    in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb
             spective cohort study of the economic value of   prostheses: systematic literature review. J Reha-
             orthotic and prosthetic services among Medicare   bil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):247-262.
             beneficiaries. Final report. Vienna (VA): Dob-  22.  Gordon R, Magee C, Frazer A, Evans C,
             son DaVanzo & Associates, LLC; 2013 [accessed   McCosker K. An interim prosthesis program
             2015 Mar 31].  http://mobilitysaves.org/docs/  for lower limb amputees: comparison of public
             Dobson_Davanzo_Study_on_Cost_Effective-       and private models of service. Prosthet Orthot
             ness.pdf. 2013.                               Int. 2010;34(2):175-183.
          12.  Yong YV, Shafie AA. Economic evaluation of   23.  MacKenzie EJ, Jones AS, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC,
             enhanced asthma management: a systematic      Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Kel-
             review. Pharm. Pract. (Granada). 2014;12(4):493.  lam JF, Smith DG, Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr
          13.  World Development Indicators; PPP conversion   AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR.
             factor (GDP) to market exchange rate ratio. The   Health-care costs associated with amputation
             World Bank Group; 2015 [accessed 2015 Oct 12].   or reconstruction of a limb-threatening injury.
             http://data.worldbank.org.                    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A(8):1685-1692.
          14.  World Development Indicators; Inflation, GDP   24.  Gil J, Schiff AP, Pinzur MS. Cost comparison:
             deflator (annual %). The World Bank Group;    limb  salvage  versus  amputation  in  diabetic
             2015 [accessed 2015 Oct 12]. http://data.world-  patients with charcot foot. Foot Ankle Int.
             bank.org.                                     2013;34(8):1097-1099.
          15.  Chiou CF, Hay JW, Wallace JF, Bloom BS, Neu-  25.  Datta D, Harris I, Heller B, Howitt J, Martin R.
             mann PJ, Sullivan SD, Yu HT, Keeler EB, Henning   Gait, cost and time implications for changing
             JM, Ofman JJ. Development and validation of a   from PTB to ICEX (R) sockets. Prosthet Orthot
             grading system for the quality of cost-effective-  Int. 2004;28(2):115-120.
             ness studies. Med Care. 2003;41(1):32-44.  26.  Selles RW, Janssens PJ, Jongenengel CD,
          16.  Langer A. A framework for assessing Health   Bussmann JB. A randomized controlled trial
             Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal   comparing functional outcome and cost effi-
             instruments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:253.  ciency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a
          17.  Spiegel BM, Targownik LE, Kanwal F, DeRosa V.,   conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in
             Dulai GS, Gralnek, IM, Chiou, CF. The quality   transtibial amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
             of published health economic analyses in diges-  2005;86(1):154-161; quiz 180.
             tive diseases: a systematic review and quantitative   27.  Normann E, Olsson A, Brodtkorb TH. Modu-
             appraisal. Gastroenterol. 2004;127(2):403-411.  lar socket system versus traditionally laminated
          18.  Walker DG, Wilson RF, Sharma R, Bridges J,   socket: a cost analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int.
             Niessen L, Bass EB, Frick K. Best practices for   2011;35(1):76-80.
             conducting economic evaluations in health care:   28.  Webster JB, Poorman CE, Cifu DX. Guest edito-
             a systematic review of quality assessment tools.   rial: Department of Veterans Affairs amputations
             Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research   system of care: 5 years of accomplishments and
             and Quality (US); 2012.                       outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(4):vii-xvi.
          19.  Peterson LE, Goodman C, Karnes EK, Chen CJ,   29.  MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Pollak AN, Webb LX,
             Schwartz JA. Assessment of the quality of cost   Swiontkowski MF, Kellam JF, Smith DG, Sanders
             analysis literature in physical therapy. Phys Ther.   RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson
             2009;89(8):733-755.                           BM, Burgess AR, Castillo RC. Long-term per-
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26