Page 21 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3
P. 21
TRANSTIBIAL ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS 97
AP, Norvell DC, Czerniecki JM. Prosthetic fit- 20. Hafner B. State of the science evidence report
ting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb guidelines. Washington (DC): American Acad-
amputation: a prospective study. J Rehabil Res emy of Orthotists & Prosthetists; 2008.
Dev. 2012;49(10):1493-1504. 21. Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ. Differences
11. Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC. Retro- in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb
spective cohort study of the economic value of prostheses: systematic literature review. J Reha-
orthotic and prosthetic services among Medicare bil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):247-262.
beneficiaries. Final report. Vienna (VA): Dob- 22. Gordon R, Magee C, Frazer A, Evans C,
son DaVanzo & Associates, LLC; 2013 [accessed McCosker K. An interim prosthesis program
2015 Mar 31]. http://mobilitysaves.org/docs/ for lower limb amputees: comparison of public
Dobson_Davanzo_Study_on_Cost_Effective- and private models of service. Prosthet Orthot
ness.pdf. 2013. Int. 2010;34(2):175-183.
12. Yong YV, Shafie AA. Economic evaluation of 23. MacKenzie EJ, Jones AS, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC,
enhanced asthma management: a systematic Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Kel-
review. Pharm. Pract. (Granada). 2014;12(4):493. lam JF, Smith DG, Sanders RW, Jones AL, Starr
13. World Development Indicators; PPP conversion AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, Burgess AR.
factor (GDP) to market exchange rate ratio. The Health-care costs associated with amputation
World Bank Group; 2015 [accessed 2015 Oct 12]. or reconstruction of a limb-threatening injury.
http://data.worldbank.org. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A(8):1685-1692.
14. World Development Indicators; Inflation, GDP 24. Gil J, Schiff AP, Pinzur MS. Cost comparison:
deflator (annual %). The World Bank Group; limb salvage versus amputation in diabetic
2015 [accessed 2015 Oct 12]. http://data.world- patients with charcot foot. Foot Ankle Int.
bank.org. 2013;34(8):1097-1099.
15. Chiou CF, Hay JW, Wallace JF, Bloom BS, Neu- 25. Datta D, Harris I, Heller B, Howitt J, Martin R.
mann PJ, Sullivan SD, Yu HT, Keeler EB, Henning Gait, cost and time implications for changing
JM, Ofman JJ. Development and validation of a from PTB to ICEX (R) sockets. Prosthet Orthot
grading system for the quality of cost-effective- Int. 2004;28(2):115-120.
ness studies. Med Care. 2003;41(1):32-44. 26. Selles RW, Janssens PJ, Jongenengel CD,
16. Langer A. A framework for assessing Health Bussmann JB. A randomized controlled trial
Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal comparing functional outcome and cost effi-
instruments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:253. ciency of a total surface-bearing socket versus a
17. Spiegel BM, Targownik LE, Kanwal F, DeRosa V., conventional patellar tendon-bearing socket in
Dulai GS, Gralnek, IM, Chiou, CF. The quality transtibial amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
of published health economic analyses in diges- 2005;86(1):154-161; quiz 180.
tive diseases: a systematic review and quantitative 27. Normann E, Olsson A, Brodtkorb TH. Modu-
appraisal. Gastroenterol. 2004;127(2):403-411. lar socket system versus traditionally laminated
18. Walker DG, Wilson RF, Sharma R, Bridges J, socket: a cost analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int.
Niessen L, Bass EB, Frick K. Best practices for 2011;35(1):76-80.
conducting economic evaluations in health care: 28. Webster JB, Poorman CE, Cifu DX. Guest edito-
a systematic review of quality assessment tools. rial: Department of Veterans Affairs amputations
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research system of care: 5 years of accomplishments and
and Quality (US); 2012. outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(4):vii-xvi.
19. Peterson LE, Goodman C, Karnes EK, Chen CJ, 29. MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Pollak AN, Webb LX,
Schwartz JA. Assessment of the quality of cost Swiontkowski MF, Kellam JF, Smith DG, Sanders
analysis literature in physical therapy. Phys Ther. RW, Jones AL, Starr AJ, McAndrew MP, Patterson
2009;89(8):733-755. BM, Burgess AR, Castillo RC. Long-term per-

