Page 73 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3

GENIUM KNEE: MOBILITY & ECONOMIC OUTCOMES 149

4. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Miro RM, Cress ME, falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
Lura DJ, Quillen WS, Carey SL, Dubey RV, 2002;83:1566-71.
Mengelkoch LJ. Functional performance differ- 14. Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Cho B,
ences between the Genium and C-Leg prosthetic Cunniffe B, Licht S, Maguire, Nash MS. The
knees and non-Amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev. amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to
Forthcoming. assess determinants of the lower-limb ampu-
5. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lewandowski AL, Kim tee’s ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
SH, Mengelkoch LJ. A method for training step- 2002;83:613-27.
over-step stair descent gait with stance yielding 15. Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ, Hubbard SL.
prosthetic knees. J Prosthet Orthot. 2012;24:10-5. Comparison of nonmicroprocessor knee mech-
6. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lura DJ, Lewandowski anism versus C-Leg on Prosthesis Evaluation
AL, Quillen WS, Kim SH. Stair ascent and ramp Questionnaire, stumbles, falls, walking tests, stair
gait training with the Genium knee. Technol descent, and knee preference. J Rehabil Res Dev.
Innov. 2014;15(4):349-58. 2008;45:1-14.
7. Hafner BJ, Willingham LL, Buell NC, Allyn KJ, 16. Kannenberg A, Zacharias B, Mileusnic M, Seyr
Smith DG. Evaluation of function, performance, M. Activities of daily living: Genium bionic pros-
and preference as transfemoral amputees transi- thetic knee compared with C-Leg. J Prosthet
tion from mechanical to microprocessor control Orthot. 2013;25:110-7.
of the prosthetic knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 17. Cress ME, Buchner DM, Questad KA, Esselman
2007;88:207-17. PC, deLateur BJ, Schwartz RS. Continuous-scale
8. Highsmith MJ. Microprocessor knees: consid- physical functional performance in healthy
erations for accommodation and training. J older adults: a validation study. Arch Phys Med
Prosthet Orthot. 2013;25:60-4. Rehabil. 1996;77:1243-50.
9. US Department of Justice. ADA standards 18. Cress ME, Petrella JK, Moore TL, Schenkman
for accessible design. Washington (DC): US ML. Continuous-scale physical functional
Department of Justice; 2010. performance test: validity, reliability, and sen-
10. Buell NC, Willingham LL, Allyn KJ, Hafner BJ, sitivity of data for the short version. Phys Ther.
Smith DG. Evaluation of gait style to ascend 2005;85:323-35.
and descend stairs for lower limb amputees. 19. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Miro RM, Cress ME,
In: Boone D, editor. Proceedings of the 11th Quillen WS, Carey SL, Dubey RV, Mengelkoch
World Congress of the International Society of LJ. Concurrent validity of the continuous scale
Prosthetics and Orthotics; 2004 Aug 1-6 Hong physical functional performance-10 (CS-PFP-10)
Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong National Society test in transfemoral amputees. Technol Innov.
of the International Society for Prosthetics and Forthcoming 2016 Aug.
Orthotics; 2004. p 367. 20. Cohen J, editor. Statistical power analysis for
11. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Kaluf B, Miro RM, the behavioral sciences. 2 ed. Hillsdale (NJ):
nd
Mengelkoch LJ, Klenow TD. Psychometric Erlbaum; 1988.
evaluation of the HAI and SAI in transfemoral 21. Buhi ER, Goodson P, Neilands TB. Out of sight,
amputees using a microprocessor knee system. not out of mind: strategies for handling missing
Technol Innov. Forthcoming 2016 Aug. data. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32:83-92.
12. Dite W, Connor HJ, Curtis HC. Clinical identi- 22. Kenward MG, Molenberghs G. Last observation
fication of multiple fall risk early after unilateral carried forward: a crystal ball? J Biopharm Stat.
transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;19:872-88.
2007;88:109-14. 23. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lura DJ, Dubey RV,
13. Dite W, Temple VA. A clinical test of stepping Carey SL, Quillen WS, Mengelkoch LJ. Short
and change of direction to identify multiple and mid-distance walking and posturography