Page 210 - Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring
P. 210

a dmi ni st ering  sacr e d  nu rs i ng  a ct s
               1. Inclusion. The need for identity, attention, and association with
                others; the need to belong; the struggle about whether one is
                “in” or “out,” alone or together, private or public. Inclusion can
                be associated with the original psychological notions of introver-
                sion or extroversion in different characteristics of people.
               2. Control. The need for autonomy; the power to influence author-
                ity. Control also refers to decision-making processes between
                people. The dynamic is between controlling others or being con-
                trolled by others. It includes issues of dominance: top-bottom,
                dependent-independent.
               3. Affection. The need for intimate, emotional relationships
                between and among others. These dynamics represent tension
                between intimacy versus isolation, whether one is close to or dis-
                tant from and with other humans. Affection includes feelings of
                love, tenderness, acceptance, trust, warmth, and so forth; it also
                represents the ability to constructively handle opposite feelings,
                such as anger, hate, sadness, guilt, and related emotions.
               These  three  interpersonal  needs  are  manifest  in  the  ancient
           energetic systems described by Myss (1966). She points out that the
           spiritual challenge of our energetic being is to learn to interact con-
           sciously with others, to form unions with people who can support
           our development and release relationships that handicap our growth.
           Within the  energetic  model,  Myss  introduces the laws  of magne-
           tism within the context of relationships: “[T]hese laws mean that
           we generate patterns of energy that attract people who are opposite
           us in some way; who have something to teach us. Nothing is ran-
           dom; prior to every relationship we have ever formed, we opened the
           door with energy that we were generating. . . . The more conscious
           we become, the more consciously we can utilize the energy” (Myss
           1996:132).
               Myss says that in every relationship there is a primary conflict of
           faith  and  choice:  relationships  generate  conflict  and  conflict  gener-
           ates choice. We break free when we learn to transcend the dualism
           between others and ourselves (we are all connected at the human spirit
           level) and transcend the dualism between God and ourselves. Myss
           (1996:135) reminds us that as long as we focus on trying to control



           182
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215