Page 46 - Essentials of Nursing Leadership and Management, 5th Edition
P. 46

CikguOnline
         2208_Ch03_021-038.qxd  11/6/09  5:55 PM  Page 33
                                                                        chapter 3 | Nursing Practice and the Law 33        CikguOnline
                   A condition is considered terminal when, to a  checked the heart rate, pupils, and respirations and
                 reasonable degree of medical certainty, there is lit-  stated, “I just cannot do it to her.” (Guido, 2001,
                 tle likelihood of recovery or the condition is  p. 158). She ordered the nurses to stop the resusci-
                 expected to cause death. A terminal condition may  tation, and the physician pronounced the death of
                 also refer to a persistent vegetative state character-  the client. The nurses stated that if they had not
                 ized by a permanent and irreversible condition of  been given a direct order they would have contin-
                 unconsciousness in which there is (1) absence of  ued their attempts at resuscitation. “The court
                 voluntary action or cognitive behavior of any kind  ruled that the physician’s judgment was faulty and
                 and (2) an inability to communicate or interact  that the family had the right to sue the physician
                 purposefully with the environment (Hickey, 2002).  for wrongful death” (Guido, 2001, p. 158). The
                   Another form of advance directive is the health-  nurses were cleared in this case because they were
                 care surrogate. Chosen by the client, the health-care  following a physician’s order.
                 surrogate is usually a family member or close friend.
                 The role of the health-care surrogate is to make the  Nursing Implications
                 client’s wishes known to medical and nursing per-  The Patient Self-Determination Act does not speci-
                 sonnel. Imperative in the designation of a health-  fy who should discuss treatment decisions or advance
                 care surrogate is a clear understanding of the client’s  directives with clients. Because directives are often
                 wishes should the need arise to know them.  implemented on nursing units, however, nurses need
                   In some situations, clients are unable to express  to be knowledgeable about living wills and health-
                 themselves adequately or competently, although  care surrogates and be prepared to answer questions
                 they are not terminally ill. For example, clients with  that clients may have about directives and the forms
                 advanced Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of  used by the health-care institution.
                 dementia cannot communicate their wishes; clients  As client advocates, the responsibility for creat-
                 under anesthesia are temporarily unable to com-  ing an awareness of individual rights often falls on
                 municate; and the condition of comatose clients  nurses. It is the responsibility of the health-care
                 does not allow for expression of health-care wishes.  institution to educate personnel about the policies
                 In these situations, the health-care surrogate can  of the institution so that nurses and others involved
                 make treatment decisions on the behalf of the  in client care can inform health-care consumers of
                 client. However, when a client regains the ability   their choices. Nurses who are unsure of the policies
                 to make his or her own decisions and is capable   in their health-care institution should contact the
                 of expressing them effectively, he or she resumes  appropriate department.
                 control of all decision making pertaining to med-
                 ical treatment (Reigle, 1992). Nurses and physi-  Legal Implications of Mandatory
                 cians may be held accountable when they go  Overtime
                 against a client’s wishes regarding DNR orders and
                 advance directives.                         Although mostly a workplace and safety issue,
                   In the case Wendland v. Sparks (1998), the physi-  there are legal implications to mandatory overtime.
                 cian and nurses were sued for “not initiating CPR.”  Due to nursing shortages, there has been an
                 In this case, the client had been in the hospital for  increased demand by hospitals forcing nurses to
                 more than 2 months for lung disease and multiple  work overtime (ANA, 2000). Overtime causes
                 myeloma. Although improving at the time, during  physical and mental fatigue, increased stress, and
                 the hospitalization she had experienced three car-  decreased concentration. Subsequently, these con-
                 diac arrests. Even after this, the client had not  ditions lead to medical errors such as failure to
                 requested a DNR order. Her family had not dis-  assess appropriately, report, document, and admin-
                 cussed this either. After one of the arrests, the  ister medications safely. This practice of overtime
                 client’s husband had told the physician that he  ignores other responsibilities nurses have outside of
                 wanted his wife placed on artificial life support if it  their professional lives, which affects their mood,
                 was necessary (Guido, 2001). The client had a  motivation, and productivity (Vernarec, 2000).
                 fourth cardiac arrest. One nurse went to obtain the  Forced overtime causes already fatigued nurses
                 crash cart, and another went to get the physician  to deliver nursing care that may be less than opti-
                 who happened to be in the area. The physician  mum, which in turn may lead to negligence and
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51