Page 74 - NCJA Journal_volume1_issue1-final

Papers on corrections examined issues including probation, prison gerrymandering,

capital punishment, religion and prison, recruitment and retention of public safety staff, changing

inmate behavior, ethical issues of doing research with inmates, sex offender treatment, drug

abuse treatment, funding for rehabilitation, collateral consequences of incarceration, re-entry, the

impact of incarceration on subsequent employment, drug overdoses after release, mental illness

in prison, mental health task forces, an assessment on a program in the state, and the impact on

corrections of particular laws in the state. Absent from the conference was any paper dealing

with the huge financial burdens of the state’s prison system, descriptions of life under

correctional supervision, or racial and ethnic disparities in the North Carolina corrections system.

The papers on juvenile justice were few and only dealt with the theory of rehabilitation,

gender-responsive programming, mental health treatment in juvenile justice, the effects of

restraining juveniles, and the impact of law on juvenile justice practice. At least two more critical

issues were examined by scholars during these conferences, including racial threat and

disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) and the impact of the transfer on adolescent

development.

Criminological theory papers only focused on a handful of theories of crime, including

different aspects of social disorganization theory, social learning theory, social bonding theory,

anomie and strain theory, low self-control, labeling theory, feminist theory, and bio-social

approaches to understanding behavior. Other papers focused on mental disorders and antisocial

attitudes, moral decision-making, predicting violence in juveniles, the impact of bullying on

school shootings, the impact of PTSD on criminal behavior among veterans, the relationship

between alcohol laws and campus crime, how sociological factors impact promiscuous sexual

behaviors among college students, psychosocial factors and child sex offenders, protective

67