Page 165 - test2
P. 165

well control by adjusting drilling mud properties and the use of well control
                   equipment such as diverters and BOP stacks.

                          The drilling engineer approved the APD on behalf of the District Manager
                   after he or she reviewed the items listed above and after plan approvals were
                   verified by the MMS Plans Unit.  A MMS District Manager granted approvals of
                   APDs, with all applicable cautions and conditions as necessary from the MMS
                   Geological and Geophysical unit.  If the APD did not satisfy all of the review
                   items listed above, the drilling engineer returned the APD to the operator with
                   comments documenting the deficiencies that need to be corrected prior to APD
                   approval.

                          Operators routinely gathered information and formulated drilling
                   programs that were much more detailed than the information required in the
                   APD submitted to MMS.  For example, the drilling prognosis submitted with the
                   Macondo APD was condensed to a single page, while the full BP drilling
                   program was more than 100 pages long.

                          If an operator changed drilling plans after submission of an APD, it was
                                                                                          401
                   required to submit an “application for permit to modify” (“APM”).   The APM
                   was required to include “a detailed statement of the proposed work that would
                   materially change from the approved APD.”
                                                                  402

                          MMS’s Gulf of Mexico region was divided into five districts.  The
                   Macondo well is located in the Mississippi Canyon Block 252, which is covered
                   by the New Orleans District.  Frank Patton, an MMS drilling engineer in the New
                   Orleans District, approved the Macondo APD on behalf of David Trocquet, the
                   New Orleans District Manager.

                          The Panel found that Patton did not recognize that BP failed to submit
                   supporting documentation that the blind shear ram in the BOP stack had the
                   ability to shear the drill pipe in the hole under maximum anticipated surface
                   pressures per 30 CFR § 250.416(e).  However, the Panel reviewed evidence that
                   Cameron and Transocean both determined, prior to the APD submittal, that the
                   Deepwater Horizon BOP stack had the ability to shear the drill pipe in use.



                   401  30 CFR § 250.465.
                   402  Id.  When APMs are submitted through the e‐well system to revise the permit to drill, they are
                   submitted as a “revised permit to drill” (“RPD”).  BP submitted its revised permit to drill through
                   the e‐well system.


                                                            160
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170