Page 56 - Modern Steel Construction (April 2019)
P. 56

Fig. 10. Example of bolt
        spatial considerations.                              Fig. 11.



         t-up of the web connection plate, as shown in Figure 10. This, in   ematically) but the supporting member may be overstressed as well.

        combination with relatively narrow beam  anges, can cause bolt   Loading for joint A-2 in Table 1 represents such a case.
        fouling or entering and tightening issues. In this case, one pos-

        sible solution is to use a longer pull-off for the beam  ange bolt   Table 1. HSS-beam-to-wide-fl ange-column
        group (again, indicated in Figure 10). Just be sure to consider the   moment connection design loads.
        stability of the  ange connection plate for pull-offs on plates in   Joint  A z  V x  V y  M x  M y  M z

        compression. Note there are myriad issues in regard to entering
        and tightening. Figure 10 shows just one condition.   Coord.  (kips)  (kips)  (kips)  (k-in.)  (k-in.)  (k-in.)
           13. Keep analysis and boundary conditions in mind.  You   A-1  35  15   42     95     0.50   0.25
        should always carefully consider the degrees of freedom required   A-2  *  *  *   *      *      *
        for the desired structural behavior and performance during analy-     *Provide available axial, shear or moment strength of HSS.
        sis. Some commercially available software assumes no releases in
        the default condition, so be sure to provide releases where appro-  14. Use extended shear tabs for connecting braced beams
        priate. Figure 11 shows an example of a typical hollow structural   to column webs. When installing a braced beam between two

        section (HSS) beam-to-wide- ange-column connection.  The   column webs, the beam needs to be slid down. Due to the presence
        loading chart in Table 1 suggests axial load, shears and bending   of gussets, swinging a braced beam inside the column is a dif cult

        moments for all three axes. Notice that the connection at joint A-1   task for the erector. And the presence of cap plates or stiffeners in
        requires design moments of M y  and M z equal to 500 lb-in. and 250   column  webs can make  installation  nearly impossible. Extended
        lb-in., respectively, in combination with the other required loads.   shear plate connections offer many advantages like avoiding mem-
        This can complicate connection design and drive up design and   ber coping and less detailing erection and detailing required. A
        effort time, as well as the cost of the steel package. For the typical   major concern for the designer is to design an extended tab for
        structure, releases are appropriate. If all of the degrees of freedom   the moment at the group of bolts due to eccentricity and transfer
        truly are required, so be it.                        only shear load at the center of the column—which  makes the tab
           When communicating connection loading information to the   thicker and requires more bolts. If precise loads are supplied by
        delegated connection designer, it is best to provide the loads required   the engineer of record (EOR) these connections can be designed
        from analysis. Simply requiring a connection to develop the strength   lighter as compared to those designed for generalized UDL crite-

        of the member being connected is not necessary in most cases. This   ria. If extended tabs are speci ed at the start of the job, the beams
        can be signi cantly exacerbated when no releases are provided. Not   can be procured in lesser lengths (up to the column  ange edge)


        only is the member being connected overstressed (at least math-  thereby lowering material requirements.
        56 | APRIL 2019
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61