Page 88 - All About History - Issue 11-14
P. 88

Shakespeare: Rebel with a cause?







          The Armada was defeated but it had succeeded   He would use opposing words such as ‘fair’ and   The Essex faction had ordered a performance of the
        in creating further religious and political divisions,   ‘dark’ and ‘high’ and ‘low’: ‘fair’ and ‘high’ being   ‘deposition’ play Richard II just before the rebellion
        so the authorities were on even greater alert. Within   indications of Catholicism while ‘dark’ and ‘low’   and Shakespeare’s company had their work cut out
        this world Shakespeare got to work and, at first, kept   would indicate Protestantism. Asquith takes this   afterward denying complicity. The plan ended in
        things simple. “My reading is that the early plays   as reference to the black clothes worn by Puritans   failure in 1601, but in that same year, Shakespeare
        were light, comical, critical and oppositional, written   and to the ‘high’ church services that would include   wrote Hamlet, encouraging action against unjust
        for Lord Strange’s Men”, asserts Asquith. The earliest   mass as opposed to the ‘low’ services that didn’t. If   rule. “His more critical work supported the cause of
        plays addressed political reunion and spiritual   this theory is true – a matter of some debate – then   the Earl of Essex against the [William] Cecil regime”,
        revival. Their plots related to divided families,   it enabled Shakespeare to get specific messages   says Asquith. If this is true, then Shakespeare really
        parallels for an England cut in two.   across, using characters to signify the two sides and   was one of the defining rebels of the period.
          Asquith believes the Bard placed certain markers   by using words commonly associated with Catholic   Critics have said for decades that the writer
        in his texts that signalled a second, hidden meaning.   codes. For example, according to the theory, ‘love’ is   was against populist rebellions and supported
                                               divided into human and spiritual and ‘tempest’ refers   authority and the rule of law, “but with the recent
                                               to the turbulence of the Reformation and Counter-  reassessment of the extent of dissidence at the end
                                               Reformation and the Bard used his own terms to   of Elizabeth’s reign, Shakespeare’s Elizabethan work
                                               disguise a message that was pro-Catholic.   begins to seem more oppositional”, Asquith argues.
                                                 At the same time, Shakespeare was operating in   “What if the authority he upholds was not that
                                               establishment circles. “He was drawn into the orbit   of the breakaway Tudor state, but of the European
                                               of the court and wrote elegant pleas for toleration   church against which Henry VIII rebelled?” she
                                               to Elizabeth, in the elaborate allegorical language   asks. “What if he sympathised with the intellectual
                                               she was used to”, says Asquith. But England was   Puritan reformers, who felt secular monarchs like
                                                 becoming more violent again. Shakespeare’s   the Tudors had no business assuming spiritual
                                                   patron, the Earl of Southampton, rebelled   authority over individual conscience?
                                                    against Elizabeth I, becoming Robert, Earl of   What if he, like so many contemporaries,
                                                      Essex’s lieutenant in an attempt to raise the   opposed the destruction of the old
                                                      people of London against the government.   English landscape, from the hostels,
                                                       “ He devised a secret code,

                                                        inserting messages and double
                                                        meaning into his writing”


                                                                                        The religious upheaval before and during
         RELIGIOUS                                                                      Elizabeth I’s reign saw many people executed

         COMPROMISE?

         With the untimely death of King Edward VI in 1553,
         struck with fever and cough that gradually worsened,
         Mary I ascended to the throne and set about calling a
         halt to the Reformation. She swung England firmly back
         towards Catholicism, causing reformers to run scared
         and flee. Among those displaced was civil servant
         William Cecil, his relief of a lucky escape palpable
         as he heard of the 273 Protestants burnt to death
         under Mary’s reign. Terror had been brought on the
         Protestants but Cecil had the ear of Elizabeth, who he
         had known for years. She had embraced the Church
         of England, so much that she had been imprisoned for
         two months in the Tower of London by her half-sister
         Mary, who feared she was part of a plot to depose her.
           When Mary died in 1558, Cecil wanted to return to
         a Protestant England. Queen Elizabeth succeeded the
         throne since Mary had born no child and Cecil became
         her advisor. Within the year, a uniform state religion
         had returned. Elizabeth was confirmed as Supreme
         Governor of the Church of England.
           The Act of Uniformity in 1558 set the order of prayer
         in the English Book of Common Prayer. Crucifixes and
         candlesticks were to be allowed, although new bishops
         protested. But Protestants who had fled returned and
         wanted their religion to be supreme. Cecil ensured
         Catholics would be excluded from public life although
         he allowed them to worship as long as they did not
         threaten the queen and did so discreetly. Catholics who
         rose would be dealt with in the most serious of ways.


      88
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93