Page 24 - Motor Trend (January 2020)
P. 24

SUVOTY  I  Contenders
           Land Rover Range Rover Evoque


           PRO Hasn’t lost its looks • Or its sporty handling • Or its off-road chops
           CON It costs how much? • Jittery on-road ride • Quality concerns already
                  f the half-dozen former Of   unfortunately, also stands out—    Quality issues, though, soured   On-road, Cortina, Priddle, and
                  The Year winners present   reaching $67,190 as-tested.        them. The P250’s head-up display  Seabaugh each specifically
             O at our 2020 event, the           What do you get for that        buzzed on poor pavement, and      praised its nimbleness—but
           Range Rover Evoque looks and      kind of dosh? The interior, which   the P300’s snazzy steering wheel   then dissent began to creep in
           feels like it has changed the least.   continues to be a grab bag of   stitching was coming undone. The   again as judges took digs at the
           Several judges had a hard time    Jaguar and Land Rover parts,       double touchscreen setup in both   “dimwitted” transmission and
           believing this edition actually   nonetheless looks hip and          vehicles was a bit slow and had a   over-stressed base P250 engine.
           rides on a new platform and isn’t   modern with its digital instrument   tendency to freeze momentarily,   Then there’s the ride quality,
           just a midcycle update.           screen, pop-up infotainment        and the P300’s screens required   which received no better review
              That said, the Evoque remains   screen, and combination analog/   a full 20 seconds to boot up after   than “harsh” or “rough.”
           a crowd pleaser. This is still a   digital lower control screen.     engine start.                        Whereas the original Evoque
           sharp and distinct product,       Judges were particularly fond        This dynamic carried over       was a home run, the new one is a
           obviously a Land Rover but a      of the tweed inserts on the P300   to driving impressions, as well.   solid double. Unfortunately, it’s
           standout in a sea of two-row      HSE R-Dynamic’s doors, seats,      Treated like a Land Rover, it made   still priced like a home run.
           luxury crossovers. Its price,     and center-console armrest.        us all fans on the off-road course.   Scott Evans

            SPECS              Range Rover Evoque P250   Range Rover Evoque P300 HSE (R-Dynamic)
           Base Price/As Tested  $43,645/$59,215         $56,795/$67,190
           Power (SAE net)     246 hp @ 5,500 rpm        296 hp @ 5,500 rpm
           Torque (SAE net)    269 lb-ft @ 1,300 rpm     295 lb-ft @ 1,500 rpm
           Accel, 0-60 mph     9.0 sec                   8.1 sec
           Quarter Mile        16.8 sec @ 81.3 mph       16.2 sec @ 84.5 mph
           Braking, 60-0 mph   129 ft                    129 ft
           Lateral Acceleration  0.77 g (avg)            0.80 g (avg)
           MT Figure Eight     28.5 sec @ 0.62 g (avg)   27.9 sec @ 0.63 g (avg)
           EPA City/Hwy/Comb   20/27/23 mpg              21/26/23 mpg                               P250

           Vehicle Layout Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV Engine/Transmission 2.0L turbo DOHC 16-valve I-4/9-speed automatic Curb Weight (F/R Dist)
           P250 4,300 lb (59/41%) P300 HSE 4,394 lb (59/41%) Wheelbase 105.6 in Length x Width x Height 172.1 x 75.0 x 64.9 in Energy Consumption, City/Hwy P250
           169/125 kW-hr/100 miles P300 HSE 160/130 kW-hr/100 miles CO2 Emissions, Comb P250 0.86 lb/mile P300 HSE 0.84 lb/mile



           Lexus UX


           PRO Decent value story • Fantastic fuel economy • Smooth transmission
           CON Gutless powertrains • Molar-rattling ride • Useless in snow/dirt

                 lthough priced in line with   easier. Fuel economy is about the
                 the outgoing CT 200h        best you can find for a crossover
             Ahatchback, the Lexus           from a premium brand.
           UX isn’t so much an entry sport      However, it’s downright cynical
           utility—especially when there’s no   that a luxury brand would offer   oval that mimics snowdrifts. The   Loh defended the UX’s use
           AWD option on the base engine—    an engine with a meager, thrashy   hybrid’s AWD system even over-    case for drivers who might like
           as it is a tall compact hatchback.  169 hp and 151 lb-ft of torque. “I   heated, requiring a tow.      the high seating position and
              “The UX is an unbelievable     refuse to believe it hits 60 in 8.5   Inside, Lexus did its homework.   fashion-forward styler.
           value,” the proudly frugal Zach   seconds,” Evans said. Plus, the    The driver’s surroundings are        All this aside, you still need
           Gale said. But Seabaugh called    UX’s jarring ride—thanks to its    “modern and handsome, with        to look at it every morning. You
           the UX “truly disappointing” by   economy car roots—is appalling.    clear investment and quality fit/  might be used to the grille by
           the same metric.                     Lexus doesn’t give ground       finish,” Loh said. However, the rear   now, but the manga-influenced
              The smooth CVT (one the best   clearance measurements for         door aperture is tiny, and second   lines are startling. But some folks
           executions we’ve found) will make   the UX; all we know is we got    row is claustrophobic. The UX     see the beauty in such beasts.
           a stop-and-go commute much        repeatedly stuck in the silty-sand   200’s hatch area is trifling.      Mark Rechtin

            SPECS              2019 Lexus UX 200       2019 Lexus UX 250h F-Sport
           Base Price/As Tested  $33,175/$40,450       $37,175/$42,685
           Power (SAE net)     169 hp @ 6,600 rpm      143 hp @ 6,000 rpm + elec motor; 181 hp comb
           Torque (SAE net)    151 lb-ft @ 4,800 rpm   132 lb-ft @ 4,400 rpm + elec motor
           Accel, 0-60 mph     8.5 sec                 8.3 sec
           Quarter Mile        16.5 sec @ 85.6 mph     16.3 sec @ 87.3 mph
           Braking, 60-0 mph   129 ft                  128 ft
           Lateral Acceleration  0.78 g (avg)          0.80 g (avg)
           MT Figure Eight     28.2 sec @ 0.62 g (avg)  28.1 sec @ 0.62 g (avg)
           EPA City/Hwy/Comb   29/37/33 mpg            41/38/39 mpg                                     250h
           Vehicle Layout 200 Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV 250h F-Sport Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV Engine/Transmission 200 2.0L
           DOHC 16-valve I-4/1-speed auto + cont variable auto 250h F-Sport 2.0L Atkinson-cycle DOHC 16-valve I-4 plus fr/rr elec motors/1-speed auto
           + cont variable auto Curb Weight (F/R Dist) 200 3,327 lb (60/40%) 250h F-Sport 3,626 lb (57/43%) Wheelbase 103.9 in Length x Width x Height

           177.0 x 72.4 x 60.0 in Energy Consumption, City/Hwy 200 116/91 kW-hr/100 miles 250h F-Sport 82/89 kW-hr/100 miles CO2 Emissions, Comb 200
           0.60 lb/mile 250h F-Sport 0.49 lb/mile
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29