Page 18 - American Rifleman (February 2020)
P. 18

POLITICAL REPORT


                                      Trump Administration Completes

                                      Pro-Gun Regulatory Reform

                                           hanks to President Trump, small   components; making small springs and screws for
                                           businesses and individual gun owners   guns exposed your business to heavy regulation,
                                      T will no longer suffer the longstanding   regardless of whether you actually exported
                                      roadblocks imposed by America’s Cold War-  anything outside the United States. As the costs
                                      era “export” regime for firearms, ammunition   of regulatory compliance climbed, so did prices.
                                      and related accessories. The chronology of this   The problems for American gun owners
                                      transformation—and its relevance to Second   only increased when the Obama administration
                                      Amendment rights—warrants some attention.  folded gunsmithing into its regulatory defini-
                                         As with most bureaucratic endeavors,   tion of “manufacturing.” This maneuver trig-
                                      America’s export rules were built upon profes-  gered State Department registration for those
                                      sions of good intent; our country wished to   performing common gunsmithing operations
                                      protect its most sensitive military technology   on existing firearms. Because many gunsmiths
              By Jason Ouimet         from falling into enemy hands. But the export   could not afford ITAR’s registration and compli-
              Executive Director,     rules themselves ignored the overlap that   ance costs, the result was not only foreseeable,
              NRA-ILA                 naturally exists when goods are capable of both   but intentional: many gunsmiths and gunsmith-
                                      military and non-military uses. Radar systems, for   ing schools were quickly driven out of business.
                                      example, are commonly utilized by civilian and   As the USML’s scope extended beyond
                                      military vessels. Another obvious example: fire-  physical items and onto “technical data” about
                                      arms and ammunition. Items capable of dual use   items, the government began to regulate blue-
              YOUR MEMBERSHIP         (i.e., military and non-military use) were therefore   prints, diagrams and service manuals. The State
              DUES ARE NOT            termed “dual-use” items by export control pro-  Department also began treating the online pub-
              ENOUGH.                 fessionals. This should have been simple enough.   lication of such information as the equivalent of
                                      Unfortunately, the bureaucratic hostility toward   an “export” requiring prior approval. Before too
              If you want to DEFEND your   firearms and ammunition soon crept in.  long—and unconcerned by the Constitutional
              right to own and carry a   Because most household items could—at   implications—the State Department was threat-
              firearm …               least theoretically—be stretched to resemble   ening to flex ITAR jurisdiction over everyone
              If your FREEDOM to hunt and   something with military potential, the export law  who dared to “publish” a parts diagram or
              shoot is important to you …   slapped the strictest regulations and oversight   handloading formula online.
                                      onto inherently military equipment. By limiting   The Trump administration reforms are poised
              Then you need to SUPPORT   bureaucracy’s reach to warfighting equipment,   to finally relieve these bureaucratic pressures.
              the NRA Institute for   politicians reassured American industry of its   Most firearms and ammunition, as well as their
              Legislative Action.     continued dominance in foreign markets, free of   parts, components and accessories, would now
              We are the only arm of    overly burdensome red tape. Export oversight   be managed under the business-friendly CCL
              NRA specifically charged    of these items was ultimately delegated to two   instead of the oppressive USML. The aforemen-
              with defending your     departments: the U.S. State Department and   tioned problems for non-exporting manufactur-
              Second Amendment        the U.S. Commerce Department.          ers, gunsmiths and those who publish technical
              freedoms on Capitol Hill,   The U.S. State Department was tasked with   data about such items on the web would no
              and in state legislatures and   administering the International Trafficking in   longer exist. In the absence of such weights,
              courtrooms across America.  Arms Regulations (ITAR), where regulated items   America’s exporting manufacturers are free to run
                                      were itemized on the U.S. Munitions List (USML).  more competitively among the global markets.
              Visit nraila.org to support   Meanwhile, the U.S. Commerce Department   When it comes to the business of firearms,
              NRA-ILA today!
                                      used the Export Administration Regulations   America’s regulatory approach is finally returning
                                      to regulate items via the agency’s Commerce   to its baseline commitment: American security.
                                      Control List (CCL).                    Exports will continue to require licenses and
                                         Although regulated items on the USML   multi-agency review to safeguard against
                                      were reportedly pared-down to those that   harm, alongside compliance with the importing
                                      “provide the United States with a critical military   country’s laws. Regulations that favored
                                      or intelligence advantage” or, in the case of   unscrupulous overseas competitors weren’t
                                      weapons, “are inherently for military end use,”   what America needed—our security interests
                                      the government increasingly restricted whatever   are much better served when foreign arms sales
                                      made the USML list. One official described it as   are handled by U.S. companies possessing an
                                      building “a taller fence around a smaller yard.”   unrivaled record of compliance, transparency
                                         Compliance became a veritable minefield. Any  and freedom to perform at their best.
                                      business hoping to manufacture the most basic   With export reform,
               NRA-ILA: (800) 392-8683  component of an item on the USML was forced   President Trump has
               NRA-ILA website: nraila.org  to register with the State Department and pay a   provided yet another win
               For related articles, go to   $2,250 annual fee. These regulatory burdens soon  for Second Amendment
               nrapublications.org.   fell upon every small business making firearm   advocates.
               16                                  FEBRUARY 2020  AMERICAN RIFLEMAN
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23