Page 33 - ATR 6 2012 web
P. 33

“the issue with the hazmat basic is the fmcsa’s failure to recogNize
                         there are Vast leVels of exPosure iN that oNe basic.”

                                                     —JasoN wiNg,
                                   maNager of safety comPliaNce aNd traiNiNg,
                                                abf freight system, iNc.






              There is also new criteria for defin-  months with one of those inspections   We’ve got to make this easy to under-
          ing which carriers will be subject to the   occurring in the past 12 months. Those   stand for our shippers, our insurance
          lower HM intervention thresholds in   inspections of placarded vehicles also   companies, or attorneys,” Wing said.
          each BASIC.                        must make up at least 5 percent of the   “Carriers with a sufficient number
              “As a large LTL carrier, we wanted   carrier’s total inspections. Any carrier   of inspections, but lack violations will
          a revision to the hazmat BASIC because   that has a hazmat safety permit or that   be assigned a score of 0 percent. On
          we didn’t feel we were getting a fair   has been identified as a carrier of plac-  a scale of 0 to 100, if a shipper sees
          shake,” Wing said. “Our shippers are   arded quantities of hazardous materials   a score of ‘0’ instead of ‘Insufficient’
          not regulated by FMCSA, they don’t   from an investigation in the past two   they’ll know that’s a pretty good score.”
          have to follow the same rules as we do.   years is considered a hazardous materi-
          The only defense we have is to say ‘no’   als carrier.                coNcErNS rEMaIN
          to a load. If the packages don’t have   Still, Wing says, the changes leave   Questions loom regarding CSA’s
          labels on them, it’s our responsibility to   something to be desired. “You tell   effectiveness in determining accident
          tell them.”                        me we can haul the most dangerous   preventability.
              Take for example a major retailer   substances in transportation because   “When you have 43 percent of
          that sells a product containing a hazmat   we’re that safe, yet because of arbitrary   your program proven to not correlate
          component—an at home helium balloon   scoring I’m on alert status because the   with crash risk, I think there is a prob-
          kit for instance. If it’s returned to the   hazmat BASIC? The right hand is not   lem,” Wing said. FMCSA is expected to
          store, and not emptied, it needs to be   talking to the left hand.”   publish a final rule in 2013 that will
          packaged and labeled for a hazmat haul,                               tie a carrier’s safety rating to roadside
          and this is largely a challenge many   cHaNgINg THE laNgUagE          performance and CSA scores. “I cannot
          shippers would prefer not to deal with.  SMS has made changes to better   imagine this going forward, as is, a year
              “Do you think anyone at a major   clarify violations, including a revision   from now. If it does, well, we haven’t
          retail establishment is hazmat trained?   to the “Summary of Activities” section   seen a legal battle come to pass that will
          Do you think they want to be?      of the SMS homepage to separate the   rival this one.”
              “We go to great lengths with our   fatality/injury category into two sepa-  Time and resources dedicated to
          shippers to get it right. But in this case   rate categories          the program, Wing fears, is behind the
          the retailer becomes the shipper,” Wing   “If there were 50 injuries and one   determination to fully implement CSA.
          said. “FMCSA asked should we require   fatality, it would read ‘51,’” Wing said.   “They began working on CSA 2010 in
          training for these retailers or should we   “Shippers and insurance companies   2004, with the end goal of assigning a
          provide additional exceptions for them?   were having trouble distinguishing   safety rating. With that being the end
          It all relates back to business decisions.”  between fatalities and injuries.”  goal, I think they are struggling with
              FMCSA has made minor changes       What previously read as        the thought of having to stop short
          to the definition of its hazmat carrier   “Insufficient Data” will now be “Less   of doing that. That worries me a little
          classification category, which has lower   Than 5 Inspections” and “Inconclusive”   bit. We’re a safe carrier and we want
          intervention thresholds than for non-  will now be “No Violations Within 1   to be identified as such, but I’m afraid
          hazmat carriers. To be subject, a carrier   Year.”                    CSA still has a ways to go to before it
          must have had at least two inspections   “You and I know what ‘insufficient   becomes all it was laid out to be.”
          on placarded vehicles within the past 24   data’ means, but our shippers don’t.

          arkansas trucking report | issue 6 2012	                                                                  33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38