Page 351 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 351

341


              Again, the first words of the sentence alert the reader that you are now going to
            qualify the negative stuff you said before by offering some optimism. You could
            also use some conditional sentences to show what might have been possible if you
            had had different circumstances, or what might be possible in the future.

                If we had managed to … then we might have been able to …

                If we manage to … then we might be able to.






            19.9   How should I relate my limitations to possible
                  future work?
              Don’t attempt to lessen the negative impact of the limitations of your research (see
            Chapter    9   ) by simply claiming that these limitations could be solved in ‘future

            work’. Referees and editors can quickly see through this strategy and thus dismiss
            your claims as being unfounded or vague. Instead, you need to give some details
            regarding  how  they could be solved.


              Below I will examine three examples of very poor paragraphs describing limitations
            and future work. The  italics  are mine.

                  EXAMPLE   1  Although we obtained meaningful results, the present study is not without
              limitations, which  must  be addressed in future research. First, the causal relationships in our
              test model could be reversed by cross-sectional research. Future studies  may  employ experi-
              mental and longitudinal designs to evaluate the causality implied in our model. Second, the
              samples used in the study are only from Mainland China.  We  should take  care  when  gener-

              alizing  these findings to other cultures.
              The referees of Example 1 might ask themselves:

                 1.     who is supposed to address the  limitations  - the author or the community?

                2.     why ‘must’ they be addressed ( must  sounds very strong)?

                3.     why has the author used  may  (which indicates a 50-60 % probability) in rela-
                 tion to future studies?
                4.     who does  we  refer to - the author or the community?





                  5.   why should we ‘take care’ and why should the findings be generalized?
                6.     what kind of ‘care’ should we take?
                7.     if the findings are going to be ‘generalized’, how might this be done and with

                 what possible outcome?
   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356