Page 366 - English for Writing Research Papers
P. 366

357

                … Russia, Canada and the United States. In the former …


             Then, in order to put the countries in alphabetical order, Author 2 modifies it as
            follows:
                … Canada, Russia and the United States. In the former …

              The problem is that  the former  in Author 1’s sentence refers to Russia. But in Author
            2’s sentence  the former  refers to Canada. To avoid such mistakes it is always best to
            repeat the key word rather than using  it, that, this, one, former, latter  and  which.  In
            any case, if it is your job to read the final version of the manuscript it is worth taking

            such problems into consideration.
              For more on sources of ambiguity see Chapter    6    .



            20.9      Make sure everything is consistent


             Referees will suggest a delay in the publication if they find inconsistency in your

            paper. Here is a genuine example from a referee’s report. The only thing I have
            changed is the key words (X and Y).

                  1.     “Figure 1” on page 4, yet “fig 5a” on page 8.

                 2.     page 4: “Figure 1 shows an example of an X graph,” yet page 5: Figure 1 caption states
                 “Example of Y”. So is it a Y or an X graph?


                  3.   commas after some equations like on page 10, but not after all equations.
                  4.   caption to Fig 4 states “Initial Size Distribution,” yet the illustration is of a graph not a size


                 function.
                 5.     sometimes comma after i.e. e.g., and other times not
             Here is an extract from another referee’s report, which again highlights the impor-
            tance of what you may consider to be fairly marginal issues:

               This work is novel and is worthy of publication. However, the presentation of the work is,
              quite frankly, unprofessional. There are many sloppy mistakes like spelling mistakes and
              incorrect references, as well as inconsistency such as changing terminology and differences
              between captions and inline text.



            20.10   Check that your English is suitably formal



              There are certain words and expressions that are considered by most journals to be
            too informal. Check that your manuscript doesn't contain any of the following (note
            these are just examples and do not represent a comprehensive list):
   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371