Page 108 - Looking_after_school
P. 108

Looking after school: a critical analysis of personalisation in education

                the person of the students as their starting or seeing the student as a
                means to achieve other ends?

                Exploratory check of forms of personalisation
                We believe that a (school-)pedagogical perspective is often missing
                in the debate on ‘student-centrism’. The debate is mostly about opti-
                mising employability or about making the learning process more effi-
                cient and more effective. The debate is less often appraised in light of
                the school: can all variances of student-centrism be reconciled with
                scholastic forms of learning? How does student-centrism challenge
                scholastic learning which seeks to materialise the assumptions of free-
                dom, equality, and formation? The following check is not exhaustive
                or final, and is quite abstract and analytical, but hopefully it provides
                an indication of the kind of challenges that the school has to face when
                confronted with personalisation.

                Year class system and personal learning pathways

                In schools, education and learning are to be organised, and there are
                naturally numerous principles and models of organisation. The archi-
                tecture of the educational institution uses the system of year groups
                (mostly alongside grades, school types, and specialisations). Students
                are grouped in a class, based on their age and according to the subject
                matter which should be processed during the period of one school
                year (also see Doornbos, 1969). The subject matter and contents are
                uniform, and this is usually also the case for the teaching method, even
                though this is not necessary (the teacher can for instance differentiate
                among students within the class group). The most common form of
                differentiation is repeating a year (or skipping a year). One assumption
                of this system is that age coincides with the somewhat-equal capac-
                ity or maturity of students to process all subject matter at more or
                less the same speed. The critique on this system is often directed at
                the questionable effectiveness of school year repetition, and at the
                assumption that every student of the same age has the same learning
                speed. Inversely, the completely personalised learning environment
                starts from personal differences in capacity, differences in learning



                                             108
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113