Page 43 - 1Proactive Policing
P. 43

Pro-Active Policing


               De-policing  represents a  de facto police  strike,  in  which the  police  withdraw  an  aspect  of  their
               crime prevention services. It is a practical police protest at perceived political interference in their

               day-to-day task of policing.

               Author Heather MacDonald has offered yet another interpretation for the term "de-policing." In her

               book, The War on Cops, she uses the term as the antithesis for pro-active policing in general. In
               the light of the Eric Garner case in Staten Island, NY and criticism of Broken Windows policing,

               MacDonald  has  used  this  term  to  describe  the  NYPD's  policy  of  backing  away  from  actively
               pursuing  Stop  and  Frisk  procedures  as  a  primary  method  of  crime  prevention.  Recent  court
               decisions  like Ligon and Floyd have  also  contributed  to  the  atmosphere  of  de-policing  in  many

               areas of the country, but particularly New York City. Cities like Ferguson, MO and Baltimore, MD
               have been similarly affected due to what is perceived as unfair and aggressive policing in minority

               communities.

               Critics  have  long  claimed  that  when  the  law  regulates  police  behavior  it  inadvertently  reduces

               officer aggressiveness, thereby increasing crime. This hypothesis has taken on new significance
               in recent years as prominent politicians and law enforcement leaders have argued that increased
               oversight of police officers in the wake of the events in Ferguson, Missouri has led to an increase

               in national crime rates. Using a panel of American law enforcement agencies and difference-in-
               difference  regression  analyses,  this  Article  tests  whether  the  introduction  of  public  scrutiny  or
               external regulation is associated with changes in crime rates. To do this, this Article relies on an

               original dataset  of  all  police departments that  have been  subject  to federally  mandated  reform
               under 42 U.S.C. § 14141 — the most invasive form of modern American police regulation. This

               Article  finds  that  the  introduction  of  §  14141  regulation  was  associated  with  a  statistically
               significant uptick in crime rates in affected jurisdictions. This uptick in crime was concentrated in
               the years‘ immediately after federal intervention and diminished over time. This finding suggests

               that police departments may experience growing pains when faced with external regulation.


               The year 2015 has been a tumultuous one for police. Officers seem to have to respond to a rapid
               mass murder incident about once every few weeks. The media‘s over-inflated coverage of such
               events, coupled with the conflation of terms like ―active shooter,‖ ―active killer,‖ ―mass murder,‖

               and ―mass shooting‖ make it all but impossible to put a definitive number on how many incidents
               took place this year, but indisputably the issue has been on the front burner for LEOs in the past
               12 months.


                                                              43
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48