Page 45 - 1Proactive Policing
P. 45

Pro-Active Policing


               The stop-question-and-frisk program, or stop-and-frisk, in New York City, is a practice of the New
               York  City  Police  Department in  which  police  officers  stop  and question  a  pedestrian,  then frisk

               them for weapons and other contraband; this is what is known in other places in the United States
               as  the Terry stop.  The  rules  for  stop,  question,  and  frisk  are  found  in  the  state's criminal
               procedure  law section  140.50,  and  are  based  on  the  decision  of  the United  States  Supreme

               Court in  the  case  of Terry  v.  Ohio. About  685,724  people  were  stopped  in  2011.  However,  the
               number of stops has been reduced dramatically since then, to 22,939 in 2015.


               The vast majority of those stopped were African-American or Latino. According to a 2007 study,
               this disparity persists even after controlling for "precinct variability and race-specific estimates of

               crime participation". Over half were aged 14-24.  In 2011 police stopped 46,784 women, frisking
               nearly 16,000. While women represented only 6.9% of stops in 2011, guns were found in only 59

               cases; but there were 3,993 arrests of women. Guns were discovered on 0.12% and 0.13% of
               women and men respectively.


               During  the  first  presidential  debate,  Donald  Trump  again  argued  that  stop-and-frisk  was  an
               effective deterrent in New York, and that the policy hadn't been ruled unconstitutional. It wasn't
               effective, and it was ruled unconstitutional.


               Three  years  have  passed  since  a  Federal  District  Court ruled that  New  York  City‘s stop-and-
               frisk program  violated  constitutional  prohibitions  against  unreasonable  search  and  seizure  and

               discriminated against minority citizens, who were disproportionately and unjustifiably singled out
               for stops. A court-ordered reform process — overseen by an independent monitor — is off to a

               promising start. But some of the thorniest and most contentious issues lie ahead.

               Under the Fourth Amendment, police officers can legally stop and detain people only when they

               have a reasonable suspicion that the person is committing, has committed or is about to commit a
               crime.  In  New  York,  however,  it  became  common  for  police  officers  to  stop  mainly  minority

               citizens, with no basis for suspicion, and then make up a reason.

               The NYPD‘s stop-and-frisk practices raise serious concerns over racial profiling, illegal stops and

               privacy  rights.  The  Department‘s  own  reports  on  its  stop-and-frisk  activity  confirm  what  many
               people in communities of color across the city have long known: The police are stopping hundreds
               of thousands of law abiding New Yorkers every year, and the vast majority are black and Latino.


                                                              45
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50