Page 70 - fbkCardioDiabetes_2017
P. 70

46                           Cardio Diabetes Medicine 2017





              Ethical issue that should be considered is, how long   of the population, including low-risk subgroups. Low-
              can  hyperglycemia  be  permitted to continue  in dia-  risk  individuals may ignore  these recommendations
              betic subjects undergoing trial? Prolonged hypergly-  and consequently put their health conditions at risk.
              cemia or more than 6 months hyperglycemia has the   In presence limited or moderate clinical validity bur-
              potential to exacerbate macrovascular complications   densome or too strong preventive measures will raise
              and will have an adverse effect on the quality of life   ethical issues,  such as  psychological  harms:  at-risk
              creating an ethical dilemma                        children who do not adhere to lifestyle recommenda-
                                                                 tions and when they develop the disease later in life,
              Ethical Issues in Genetic susceptibility           blame may be attributed to themselves or be blamed
              testing services for Type 2 Diabetes               by others. Such  ‘victim-blaming’  or  feelings  of guilt
                                                                 will not always be justified in the context of a multi-
              Meletus is available but  experts  are not  convinced   factorial disease for which susceptibility testing is of
              of its current clinical validity and utility generating an   moderate predictive ability:  some  at-risk  individuals
              ethical  issue.  With  the  rising  number  of individuals   may develop the disease even if they take appropri-
              affected with diabetes and the significant health care   ate measures, whereas other at-risk individuals may
              costs of treatment,  the emphasis  on prevention  is   not fall ill despite their failing to take preventive ac-
              key to controlling the health burden of this disease.   tion.
              Several genetic and genomic studies have identified
              genetic variants associated with increased risk to di-
              abetes. As a result, commercial  testing is available   Ethical Issues with costly therapy and
              to predict an individual’s genetic risk.  Although the   diabetic complications
              clinical benefits of testing have not yet been demon-  Various scientific  trials have  shown  the  enhanced
              strated, it is worth considering some of the ethical im-  benefits of aggressive insulin therapy to control and
              plications of testing for this common chronic disease.   delay the  onset of complications  in sever  diabetes,
              From  an ethical perspective,  several  issues  should   but  intensive therapy  with  insulin is  costly. So,  the
              be considered during the translation of predictive   ethical dilemma faced by many doctors is whether to
              testing for  diabetes, including familial implications,   start costly, intensive therapy with expensive human
              improvement of risk communication, implications for   insulin to prevent future complications or to continue
              behavioral change and health outcomes, the Genet-  traditional therapy which could lead to early compli-
              ic Information Nondiscrimination Act, direct-to-con-  cations.   Medical practitioners  are  often faced with
              sumer testing, and appropriate age of testing.     an ethical dilemma rooted in economics. An example
                                                                 would be, foot gangrene  a dreaded  complication  of
              The variability of the  severity  of Type  2 Diabetes   diabetes. It is often possible to salvage the foot, but
              Meletus  poses  difficulties for  the ethical  evaluation   at great expense. The family must incur heavy debts
              of susceptibility testing for the disease. From a pre-  for  this high-technology treatment.  The alternative
              cautionary perspective, it could be argued that Type   to taking on this economic  burden may be  ampu-
              2 Diabetes Meletus should be viewed as a severe    tation. In young diabetics, the loss of a limb can be
              disease  and require  high levels  of genetic counsel-  crippling,  affecting  one’s employment. The difficult
              ing and psychological support or hardly causes any   decision to amputate  is  often based on social and
              psychological harm or emotional impact at all. There   economic factors. The similar can be considered in a
              may be discrepancies between the severity of a dis-  case of  end stage  renal  disease,  where  renal  trans-
              ease as perceived by medical professionals and the   plant is not feasible and the patient has multisystem
              severity  of the same disease  as perceived  by oth-  failure. The issue might well be as to how long hemo-
              er  publics. There  are both  therapeutic  options and   dialysis should be continued given the costs and an
              well-established  preventive strategies  available for   almost certain unfavorable outcome. Such dilemmas
              diabetes for children as well as for adults, at the lev-  are likely to increase as the number of diabetics with
              el of lifestyle improvements. Existence of preventive   complications increases and the resource availability
              options for Type 2 Diabetes Meletus implies a poten-  becomes scarce leading to a wider debate on ethical,
              tial for medical benefits to be obtained from suscep-  social and economic  issues related to management
              tibility testing. Therefore, if false reassurance occurs,   of diabetic complications.
              it may lead to harm.  Individuals who  are found  to
              be at decreased risk may wrongly feel assured that   Ethical  issues  with  Embryonic  stem cells:  Stem cell
              they will remain free from disease, regardless of their   research  could provide  a means of  replacing  dam-
              lifestyles.  They may  fail to  understand  that  general   aged  tissue in patients with  diabetes and  embryos
              health recommendations are  relevant to the whole   are  a potentially  rich source  of viable  stem cells.


                                                         GCDC 2017
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75