Page 225 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill

Chapter 19
https://kat.cr/user/tahir99/

REFERENCES

1. Luce JM, White DB. A history of ethics and law in the intensive 17. Hickman SE, Nelson CA, Perrin NA et al. A comparison of meth-
care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2009;25(1):221-237. ods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities:
2. Sutter PM. Laws can be unethical. Minerva Anestesiol. traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining
2010;76(7):548-549. treatment program. J. Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(7):1241-1248.
3. Schachter M, Fins JJ. Informed consent revisited: a doctrine in 18. Teaster PB, Wood EF, Lawrence SA et al. Wards of the state:
the service of cancer care. Oncologist. 2008;13(10):1109-1113. a national study of public guardianship. Stetson L Rev. 2007;
37(1):193-241.
4. Happ MB, Swigart VA, Tate JA. Patient involvement in health-
related decisions during prolonged critical illness. Res Nurs 19. Wick JY, Zanny GR. Removing the feeding tube: a procedure
Health. 2007;30(4):361-372. with a contentious past. Consult Pharm. 2009;24(12):874-883.
5. Gambert SR. Capacity to make an informed decision: an essen- 20. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR et al. Recommendations for
tial component of every initial patient encounter. Clin Geriatr. end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement
2011;19(2):9-11. by the American Academy of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care
Med. 2008;36(3):953-963.
6. White DB, Malvar G, Karr J, et al. Expanding the paradigm of
the physician’s role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically 21. Tucker KL. The campaign to deny terminally ill patients informa-
derived framework. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):743-750. tion and choices at the end of life. J Legal Med. 2009;30(4):495-514.
7. Brendel RW, Wei MH, Edersheim JG. An approach to selected legal 22. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).
issues: confidentiality, mandatory reporting, abuse and neglect, 23. Westphal DM, McKee SA. End-of-life decision making in the
informed consent, capacity decisions, boundary issues, and mal- intensive care unit: physician and nurse perspectives. Am J Med
practice claims. Med Clin North Amer. 2010;94(6):1229-1240. Qual. 2009;24(3):222-228.
8. Coll PP. Legal and ethical issues at the end-of-life: dementia. 24. Imhof SL, Kaskie B. Promoting a “good death”: determinants of
Quinnipiac Prob L J. 2009-2010;23(4):378-385. pain-management policies in the United States. J Health Polit
Policy Law. 2008;33(5):907-941.
9. Klosko C, Brisk WJ. Terminating treatment for incompetent persons:
the need for objective standards. NAELA J. 2010;VI(2):181-202. 25. Mularski RA, Puntillo K, Varkey B, et al. Pain management
within the palliative and end-of-life care experience in the ICU.
10. Hammond JB. The minimally conscious person: a case study in Chest. 2009;135(5):1360-1369.
dignity and personhood and the standard of review for with-
drawal of treatment. Wayne L Rev. 2009;55(2):821-900. 26. Stern RC, Difonzo JH. Stopping for death: re-framing our per-
spective on the end of life. U Fla J L Pub Pol. 2009;20(2):387-437.
11. Chotirmall SH, Flynn MG, Donegan CF, et al. Extubation versus
tracheostomy in withdrawal of treatment—ethical, clinical, and 27. Drum CE, White G, Taitano G, et al. The Oregon Death with
legal perspectives. J Crit Care. 2010;25:360.e1-360.e8. Dignity Act: results of a literature review and naturalistic
12. Moran JD. Families, courts, and the end of life: Schiavo and its inquiry. Disabil Health J. 2010;3(1):3-15.
implications for the family justice system. Family Court Rev. 28. Bollman C. A dignified death? Don’t forget about the physically
2008;46(2):297-317. disabled and those not terminally ill: an analysis of physician-
13. Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates assisted suicide laws. Southern Ill U L J. 2010;34(2):395-415.
of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 29. Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997).
2011;154(5):336-346. 30. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).
14. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, et al. The impact of advance 31. Cantor NL. No ethical or legal imperative to provide life support
care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomized to a permanently unaware patient. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(3);58-59.
controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345. doi:10.1136/bmj.c1345. 32. Truog RD. Medical futility. Ga St U L Rev. 2008-2009;25(4):985-1002.
15. Castillo LS, Williams BA, Hooper SM, et al. Lost in translation: 33. Whitmer M, Hurst S, Prins M, et al. Medical futility: a paradigm
the unintended consequences of advance directive law on clini- as old as Hippocrates. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2009;28(2):67-71.
cal care. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(2):121-128. 34. Choong K, Cupido C, Nelson E, et al. A framework for resolv-
16. Sonderling KE. POLST: a cure for the common advance directive— ing disagreement during end of life care in the critical care unit.
It’s just what the doctor ordered. Nova L Rev. 2009;33(2):451-480. Clin Invest Med. 2010;33(4):E240-E253.

Section01-O-ref.indd 1 12/10/2014 8:06:46 PM