Page 332 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 332

2      References


                   26. Cammarano WB, Pittet JF, Weitz S, Schlobohm RM, Marks JD.     44. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P.
                      Acute withdrawal syndrome related to the administration of   Bispectral  analysis  measures  sedation and  memory  effects of
                      analgesic and sedative medications in adult intensive care unit   propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy vol-
                      patients. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(4):676-684.           unteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(4):836-847.
                   27. Dernedde M, Stadler M, Bardiau F, Boogaerts JG. Continuous     45. O’Connor MF DS, Tung A, et al. BIS monitoring to prevent aware-
                      epidural infusion of large concentration/small volume versus   ness during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(520).
                      small concentration/large volume of levobupivacaine for post-    46. Simmons LE, Riker RR, Prato BS, Fraser GL. Assessing seda-
                      operative analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(3):796-801, table of   tion during intensive care unit mechanical ventilation with the
                      contents.                                              Bispectral Index and the Sedation-Agitation Scale.  Crit Care
                   28. Sandhu H, Morley-Forster P, Spadafora S. Epidural hematoma   Med. 1999;27(8):1499-1504.
                      following epidural anesthesia in a patient receiving unfraction-    47. Deogaonkar A, Gupta R, DeGeorgia M, et al. Bispectral Index
                      ated heparin for thromboprophylaxis.  Reg Anesth Pain Med.   monitoring correlates with sedation scales in brain-injured
                      2000;25(1):72-75.                                      patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(12):2403-2406.
                   29. Liu SS, McDonald SB. Current issues in spinal anesthesia.     48. Riker RR, Fraser GL, Simmons LE, Wilkins ML. Validating
                      Anesthesiology. 2001;94(5):888-906.                    the sedation-agitation scale with the bispectral index and
                   30. Herbstreit F, Kienbaum P, Merguet P, Peters J. Conservative   visual analog scale in adult ICU patients after cardiac surgery.
                      treatment of paraplegia after removal of an epidural catheter   Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(5):853-858.
                      during low-molecular-weight heparin treatment. Anesthesiology.     49. Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al. Delirium as a predictor of
                      2002;97(3):733-734.                                    mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive
                   31. Giebler  RM,  Scherer  RU,  Peters  J.  Incidence  of  neurologic   care unit. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1753-1762.
                      complications related to thoracic epidural catheterization.     50. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, et al. Long-term
                      Anesthesiology. 1997;86(1):55-63.                      cognitive impairment after critical illness.  N Engl J Med.
                   32. Low JH. Survey of epidural analgesia management in gen-  2013;369(14):1306-1316.
                      eral intensive care units in England. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.     51. Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman
                      2002;46(7):799-805.                                    G. The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolon-
                   33. Yaksh TL, Rudy TA. Analgesia mediated by a direct spinal   gation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998;114(2):541-548.
                      action of narcotics. Science. 1976;192(4246):1357-1358.    52. Bodenham A, Shelly MP, Park GR. The altered pharmacokinet-
                   34. Cousins MJ, Mather LE. Intrathecal and epidural administra-  ics and pharmacodynamics of drugs commonly used in criti-
                      tion of opioids. Anesthesiology. 1984;61(3):276-310.   cally ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988;14(6):347-373.
                   35. Guinard JP, Carpenter RL, Chassot PG. Epidural and intrave-    53. Wagner BK, O’Hara DA. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacody-
                      nous fentanyl produce equivalent effects during major surgery.   namics of sedatives and analgesics in the treatment of agitated
                      Anesthesiology. 1995;82(2):377-382.                    critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;33(6):426-453.
                   36. Salomaki TE, Laitinen JO, Nuutinen LS. A randomized      54. Michalk S, Moncorge C, Fichelle A, et al. Midazolam infusion
                      double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fen-  for basal sedation in intensive care: absence of accumulation.
                      tanyl infusion for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology.   Intensive Care Med. 1988;15(1):37-41.
                      1991;75(5):790-795.                                 55. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interrup-
                   37. Salomaki TE,  Leppaluoto J, Laitinen JO,  Vuolteenaho O,   tion  of  sedative  infusions  in  critically  ill  patients  undergoing
                      Nuutinen LS. Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for reducing   mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1471-1477.
                      hormonal, metabolic, and physiologic responses after thora-    56. Shelly MP, Mendel L, Park GR. Failure of critically ill patients to
                      cotomy. Anesthesiology. 1993;79(4):672-679.            metabolise midazolam. Anaesthesia. 1987;42(6):619-626.
                   38. Ramsey MA, Savage TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R.       57. Byatt CM, Lewis LD, Dawling S, Cochrane GM. Accumulation
                      Controlled sedation with alphalaxone-alphadolone.  Br Med J.   of midazolam after repeated dosage in patients receiving
                      1974;2(256):656-659.                                   mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Br Med J. (Clin
                   39. Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the   Res Ed). 1984;289(6448):799-800.
                      Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients.  Crit     58. Malacrida R, Fritz ME, Suter PM, Crevoisier C. Pharmacokinetics
                      Care Med. 1999;27(7):1325-1329.                        of midazolam administered by continuous intravenous infusion
                   40. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond   to intensive care patients. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(8):1123-1126.
                      Agitation-Sedation  Scale: validity  and reliability  in  adult     59. Bertz RJ, Granneman GR. Use of in vitro and in vivo data to
                      intensive care unit patients.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med.   estimate the likelihood of metabolic pharmacokinetic interac-
                      2002;166(10):1338-1344.                                tions. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;32(3):210-258.
                   41. Crippen DW. Neurologic monitoring in the intensive care unit.     60. Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, et al. Early intensive care
                      New Horiz. 1994;2(1):107-120.                          sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill
                                                                             patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724-731.
                   42. Hansen-Flaschen J, Cowen J, Polomano RC. Beyond the Ramsay
                      scale: need for a validated measure of sedating drug efficacy in     61. Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs
                      the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(5):732-733.  midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized
                                                                             trial. JAMA. 2009;301(5):489-499.
                   43. Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, et al. Monitoring sedation
                      status  over  time  in  ICU  patients: reliability  and  validity  of     62. Oldenhof H, de Jong M, Steenhoek A, Janknegt R. Clinical phar-
                      the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).  JAMA.   macokinetics  of  midazolam  in  intensive  care  patients,  a  wide
                      2003;289(22):2983-2991.                                interpatient variability? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;43(3):263-269.








            Section02-O-ref.indd   2                                                                                   12/10/2014   8:59:22 PM
   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337