Page 182 - Psychology of Wounds and Wound Care in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 182

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy  157

           of the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) to measure
           QoL in 26 patients receiving NPWT (Mendonca et al.   2007 ).
           The authors measured QoL before therapy and again 4 weeks
           after treatment or at wound closure. It was reported that
           there was no significant change in the QoL of patients whose
           wounds healed, but that scores on the physical- functioning
           domain of the CWIS decreased in ambulatory patients, and
           global QoL worsened for people requiring surgical interven-
           tion. The authors concluded that NPWT can cause QoL to
           worsen in some cases. However, no control group was used
           and NPWT did not appear to reduce QoL overall.
              Other researchers have also used the CWIS to measure
           QoL in patients receiving NPWT (Ousey et al.   2012 ). In this
           study, the authors compared QoL scores of NPWT patients
           (n = 10) with those of patients receiving traditional wound
           therapies (n = 11). No significant differences were found in
           QoL scores over a 12-week period, showing that QoL was nei-
           ther better nor worse for NPWT patients overall. However,
           a surprising finding was that patients who received NPWT
           showed an improvement on the social life domain of the
           CWIS in the first 2-weeks. This was not found for patients
           receiving standard treatment. The authors speculated that this
           improvement could possibly be due to NPWT patients devel-
           oping confidence to go out and socialise, or it may have been
           related to exudates management. However, the authors also
           acknowledged that there were younger patients in the NPWT
           group, so these patients may have been keener to socialise.
              Wallin et al. (  2011 ) evaluated outcomes of NPWT by ana-
           lysing clinical data for 87 patients who received NPWT. The
           authors reported that NPWT was successful in treating
           wounds for 71 % of patients. However, concerns about
           QoL resulted in cessation of treatment for four patients.
           Additionally, equipment difficulties were noted for two
           patients.  This study suggests that NPWT may negatively
           impact upon the QoL of some patients. However, this was
           only found for a minority of the patients in the study, and the
           authors relied on analysing clinical data rather than exploring
           patients’ experiences.
               In contrast, another study reported great improvements
           in the QoL of NPWT patients (Karatepe et al.   2011 ). The
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187