Page 111 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 111

78  n  CoMMUnITY MEnTAL HEALTH



           the  national  Institute  of  Mental  Health  in   and expand their practices to include a var-
           the  1980s,  psychiatric  nurses  grew  more   ied clientele base.
   C       sophisticated and diversified. They began to   In the United States, psychiatric nurses
           function  as  psychotherapists  for  individu-  continued to develop pivotal roles in a vari-
           als,  families,  and  groups  and  to  serve  as   ety  of  community  treatment  modalities.  In
           case managers and coordinators of commu-  one  national  survey  of  assertive  outreach
           nity services. Psychiatric home care nursing   programs,  findings  show  that  88%  had  a
           also began to flourish during this period as   psychiatric  nurse  as  an  integral  member
           reimbursement  for  these  services  became   of  the  treatment  team  (Deci,  Santos,  Hiott,
           available  (Fagin,  2001).  Although  nurs-  Schoenwald,  &  Dias,  1995). over  time,  psy-
           ing  research  related  to  community  mental   chiatric  clinical  nurse  specialists  became
           health was still scarce, an early intervention   recognized  as  independent  practitioners,
           study  (Slavinsky  &  Krauss,  1982),  funded   eligible  for third-party reimbursement,  and
           by the national Institute of Mental Health,   active  in  caring  for  seriously  mentally  ill
           characterized  nurses’  commitment  to  the   patients  (Iglesias,  1998;  White,  2000);  how-
           care  of  psychiatric  patients  in  the  commu-  ever,  research  addressing  specific  psychiat-
           nity and their skill in developing innovative   ric nursing interventions for this population
           programs for this population.            was still quite limited (Beebe, 2001; Rabbins
              The drive for autonomy for community   et al., 2000). The “Decade of the Brain” in the
           psychiatric  nurses  in  the  United  Kingdom   1990s brought the medicalization of psychi-
           was away from psychiatry and “general nurs-  atric  practice.  In  response  to  the  challenge
           ing.” Their “professionalization” and expan-  of integrating biologic knowledge into clin-
           sion  was  largely  achieved  through  their   ical  practice,  psychiatric  nurses  working  in
           successful incursion into primary health care   community mental health centers and in pri-
           and  distancing  from  mental  health  teams.   vate practice in the United States sought pre-
           Government initially supported community   scriptive authority. Current nursing research
           psychiatric  nurses’  efforts  in  building  new   reflects  efforts  to  understand  prescribing
           relationships with general practitioners and   practices  of  advanced  practice  psychiatric
           even  funded  their  training  (Godin,  2000).   nurses (Talley & Richens, 2001) and identify
           Community psychiatric nurses expanded in   barriers to prescriptive practice (Kaas, Dahl,
           number and also in the range of therapeutic   Dehn, & Frank, 1998).
           approaches used in their practices. As their   By  the  1990s,  community  psychiatric
           self-image  as  professionals  and  their  rela-  nurses in the United Kingdom were numeri-
           tionships  with  general  practitioners  grew,   cally the most dominant occupational group
           however,  their  caseloads  became  composed   within community mental health care; how-
           of patients with less severe problems (Godin,   ever,  this  also  meant  that  they  were  per-
           1996). The findings of one U.K. study (Barratt,   ceived as responsible for many of its failures.
           1989)  show  community  psychiatric  nurses’   Criticism  was  primarily  directed  toward
           self-perceived roles becoming more differen-  their  decision  to  shift  focus  away  from  the
           tiated, emphasizing prevention, counseling,   care of patients with severe mental illnesses
           and a variety of therapies for certain patient   in favor of work in primary health care. Many
           populations. Another study (Wetherill, Kelly,   also  questioned  the  effectiveness  of  their
           & Hore, 1987), investigating the effectiveness   work in primary care, contending that coun-
           of a structured home intervention to improve   seling-based interventions were of unproven
           patient compliance in alcohol treatment and   worth with people experiencing minor, self-
           recovery, demonstrates the growing ability of     limiting problems, and were not cost effective
           community psychiatric nurses in the United   (Hannigan, 1997). not only were community
           Kingdom to develop innovative interventions   psychiatric nurses directed to reappraise the
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116