Page 149 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 149

116  n  DEPRESSion in FAMiLiES



           studies  using  genetic  probes  to  determine   all areas than matched control families and
           which  relatives  and  which  phenotypes  are   families whose members are diagnosed with
   D       associated  with  the  genetic  contributants   alcohol  dependence,  adjustment  disorders,
           to  mood  disorders  (Suppes  &  Rush,  1996).   schizophrenia, or bipolar disorders (Keitner
           The  results  of  the  familial  loading  studies   et al., 2003). it is not surprising that depres-
           are clear, whether the approach used is the   sion  has  its  most  negative  impact  on  fami-
           “top-down”  (i.e.,  studies  of  children  with   lies during acute depressive episodes (Miller
           depressed parents; Currier, Mann, oquendo,   et al., 1992), yet families with depressed mem-
           Galfalvy,  &  Mann,  2006)  or  the  “bottom-  bers consistently experience more difficulties
           up”  approach  (i.e.,  studies  of  relatives  of   than matched control families even after ini-
           depressed children; Mondimore et al., 2007;   tial treatment. Family members living with
           Silk  et  al.,  2009).  Children  with  depressed   members  with  depression  report  greater
           parents  have  a  significantly  greater  risk  of   health problems, with family members often
           developing  depressive  disorders  and  other   being  sufficiently  distressed  themselves  to
           psychiatric disorders than do children with   require therapeutic intervention (Abela et al.,
           parents  without  depression  (Abela,  Zinck,   2009; Ahlström et al., 2009).
           Kryger, Zilber, & hankin, 2009; Gibb, Benas,   A  related  and  important  body  of  psy-
           Grassia, & McGeary, 2009). Biological marker   chosocial  research  focuses  on  depression
           studies  have  focused  on  growth  hormone,   as  a  coexisting  condition  for  those  suffer-
           serotonergic  and  other  neurotransmitter   ing with a chronic or life-threatening illness
           receptors, sleep, and hypothalamic–pituitary   (e.g., cancer, diabetes, and dementia). As an
           axis  (Gibb  et  al.,  2009;  Raison  et  al.,  2006;   example,  researchers  have  focused  on  the
           Sunderajan  et  al.,  2010;  Uher  &  McGuffin,   negative health outcomes of family caregiv-
           2008).  There  is  increasing  evidence  from   ers  in  cancer  and  how  caregiver  outcomes
           genetic studies about the genetic inheritance   also  influence  the  cancer  survivor’s  health
           of depression (holmans et al., 2007; Kendler,   outcomes (e.g., Kurtz, Kurtz, Given, & Given,
           Gatz, Gardner, & Pederson, 2005) and the fact   2005; Manne, ostroff, Winkel, Grana, & Fox,
           that abnormalities in biological markers per-  2005;  northouse  et  al.,  2007;  Segrin  et  al.,
           sist throughout the life span. The majority of   2006). These studies provide additional evi-
           studies on genetic and biomarker studies in   dence of the negative impact of depression
           recent years have focused on maternal trans-  on the entire family when family members
           mission (e.g., Gibb et al., 2009; hammen et al.,   are  living  with  members  with  depression
           2004)  rather  than  paternal  transmission  of   plus chronic or life-threatening illness and
           depression. Currier et al. (2006) is an excep-  for the importance of including family mem-
           tion  in  that  they  examined  sex  differences   bers  in  treatment  interventions  (Segrin  &
           in  parental  transmission  to  both  male  and   Badger, 2010).
           female offspring. Familial transmission rate   Few  studies  have  used  qualitative
           of  mood  disorders  from  female  probands   approaches to understand family members’
           was almost double that of males.         perspectives  and  treatment  needs  of  living
              Psychosocial  research  of  depression   with  a  depressed  person  (Ahlström  et  al.,
           in  families  has  focused  on  communica-  2009,  2010;  Badger,  1996a,  1996b).  Ahlström
           tion,  marital  problems  and  dissatisfaction,   et al. (2009) found, in their qualitative descrip-
           expressed emotion, problem solving, coping,   tive  study  of  seven  families  with  an  adult
           and  family  functioning  (Feeny  et  al.,  2009;   member who had MDD, five themes describ-
           Lazary,  Gonda,  Benko,  Gacser,  &  Bagdy,   ing  living  with  major  depression.  Family
           2009; Silk et al., 2009). The evidence strongly   members (n = 18) described being forced to
           supports that families who contain members   relinquish  control  in  everyday  life  because
           with depression have greater impairment in   the  family  members  lost  their  energy  and
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154