Page 153 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 153

120  n  DEPRESSion in WoMEn



           (hendrick,  Altshuler,  Gitlin,  Delrahim,  &   in  the  etiology  of  DD  (Abramson  &  Alloy,
           hammen, 2000). MDD is defined as the pres-  2006;  Bromberger  et  al.,  2010;  Brummelte  &
   D       ence of five or more symptoms (weight sleep,   Galea,  2010;  hammen,  2003;  noble,  2005;
           motoric, and cognitive changes) co-occurring     Stone, Gibb, & Coles, 2010).
           nearly  every  day  over  a  2-week  period   Similarly, the preponderance of gender-
           (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). At   specific theories of MDD and DYS are derived
           least one of the symptoms experienced must   from the biomedical model and focus on the
           include  depressed  mood  or  a  loss  of  inter-  type and amount of stressors women expe-
           est or pleasure in usually enjoyed activities.   rience and factors that mediate and moder-
           DYS is diagnosed when depressed mood is   ate  stress  perception.  Several  investigators
           present nearly all of the time for two or more   have  determined,  for  example,  that  women
           years and other depressive symptoms are also   have  higher  rates  of  interpersonal  distress
           present  (American  Psychiatric  Association,   than do men, and these stressors  contribute
           2000).  Rates  of  DD  in  women  ranges  from   to  their  risk  for  depression  (Brown,  2002;
           7% to 15%, 1.5 to 2 times higher than rates   hammen, 2003; hammen, Brennan, & Shih,
           obtained  for  men  in  developed  countries   2004;  Kendler,  Thornton,  &  Prescott,  2001;
           (Seedat et al., 2009; Van de Velde, Bracke, &   Sanathara,  Gardner,  Prescott,  &  Kendler,
           Levecque,  2010;  Wang  et  al.,  2010;  Williams   2003;  Zlotnick,  Kohn,  Keitner,  &  la  Grotta,
           et al., 2010); in low- and middle-income coun-  2000).  The  most  specific  of  these  models  is
           tries,  rates  of  DD  are  considerably  higher   based on two decades of empirical work by
           (World health organization, 2008).       Brown (2002) and Kendler, hettema, Butera,
              Although  gender  disparities  in  DD   Gardner,  and  Prescott  (2003),  which  shows
           have long been recognized, the role gender   that when stressors are central to a woman’s
           plays  in  its  development  and  maintenance   identity and contain elements of entrapment,
           is still evolving and remains hotly contested   humiliation, or loss, DD is likely to follow in
           (hammarstrom, Lehti, Danielsson, Bengs, &   the subsequent year. Cognitive vulnerability
           Johansson, 2009; Piccinelli & Wilkinson, 2000;   models that propose alterations in stress per-
           Ussher,  2010;  Wittchen,  2010;  World  health   ception also have been proposed to account
           organization,  2009).  The  most  dominant   for  gender  disparities  in  DD  (Brown,  2002;
           framework for understanding DD is the bio-  hyde, Mezulis, & Abramson, 2008; Kendler,
           medical  model  (hammarstrom  et  al.,  2009),   Gardner,  &  Prescott,  2002;  nolenhoeksema,
           organized around the concepts of allostasis   1994; Stone et al., 2010). Perceived hopeless-
           and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal dysreg-  ness, neuroticism, brooding rumination, and
           ulation in individuals (Brummelte & Galea,   negative  self-evaluations  are  cognitive  vul-
           2010;  Mcewen,  2003;  Sterner  &  Kalynchuk,   nerabilities that have been shown to contrib-
           2010). in broad strokes, it contends that DD   ute to risk for DD in women (Abramson &
           is attributable to uncontrolled stressors, the   Alloy, 2006; Brown, 2002; Crane, Barnhofer, &
           perception of stressors as threats, and conse-  Williams,  2007;  hyde  et  al.,  2008;  Kendler
           quent excessive physiological response. The   et al., 2002; nolen-hoeksema, 1994; Treynor,
           resulting wear and tear on stress regulatory   Gonzalez, & nolen-hoeksema, 2003). Social
           organs  in  the  central  nervous  system  and   support  also  has  been  shown  to  be  a  key
           periphery  eventually  leads  to  neurotrans-  variable in moderating the effects of stress-
           mitter  disarray,  hypothalamic–pituitary–  ful  events  (Agrawal,  Jacobson,  Prescott,  &
           adrenal  dysregulation,  and  subsequently   Kendler, 2002; Brown, 2002; Kendler, Myers,
           depressive  symptoms.  For  women,  uncon-  & Prescott, 2005). Brown (2002), for example,
           trolled and/or excessive stressors, cognitive   has shown that having a confident or other
           schemas  that  alter  stress  perception,  and   key relationship reduces the likelihood of a
           gonadal hormones all have been implicated   depressive  outcome  following  humiliation
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158