Page 182 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 182

END-OF-LiFE PLANNiNG AND CHOiCES  n  149



             rates (Gutheil & Heyman, 2005; Patel, Sinuff, &     of EOL treatment preferences with family or
             Cook, 2004).                             significant other and knowing what friends
                 Myths  about  EOL  care  become  barri-  have gone through regarding EOL decision   E
             ers to care at the EOL. Such myths include   making  (Hirschman,  Kapo,  &  Karlawish,
             beliefs  that  advance  care  planning  (ACP)   2008). Family members (i.e., surrogate decision
             is  the  same  as  permission  for  euthanasia   makers [SDMs]) of persons with moderate/
             (Jeong, Higgins, & McMillan, 2007; Silviera,   severe  dementia,  asked  to  make  EOL  treat-
             DiPiero, Gerrity, & Feudtner, 2000), that life-  ment decisions, are unclear about the goals
             sustaining treatment (LST) at the EOL cannot   of EOL, the dying trajectory likely for their
             be withheld in the absence of evidence that   loved  one,  and  the  lack  information  about
             that would have been the patient’s wish, that   palliative care and comfort options (Forbes,
             withdrawing or withholding artificial nutri-  Bern-Klug, & Gessert, 2002). Their decisions
             tion and hydration (ANH) at the EOL from   to  withhold  ANH  are  more  influenced  by
             a terminally ill or permanently unconscious   the interdisciplinary team, the  resident’s pre-
             patient is illegal, and that terminal sedation   sumed quality of life, the stage of illness, and
             is illegal even in the presence of intractable   the  comorbidities  than  by  the  AD  instruc-
             pain and suffering of a patient who is immi-  tions  (Lopez,  Amella,  Strumpf,  Teno,  &
             nently dying (Meisel, Snyder, & Quill, 2000;   Mitchell,  2010;  The,  Pasman,  Onwuteaka-
             Sabatino, n.d.).                         Philipsen, Ribbe, & van der Wal, 2002). Resi-
                 The most important factors for patients   dents with advanced dementia are likely to
             and families at the EOL in all care settings are   have a feeding tube (FT) inserted if they do
             pain and symptom management, information   not have do not resuscitate (DNR) order, and/
             about choices, preparation for death, having   or there is no nurse practitioner or physician
             a sense of completion, and being treated as   assistant on the NH staff (Mitchell, Teno, Roy,
             a  whole  person  that  includes  discussion   Kabumoto, & Mor, 2003). in NHs with low use
             about treatment preferences (Hawkins, Ditto,   of FTs—in comparison with high-use NHs—
             Danks, & Smucker, 2005; Heyland et al., 2006;   hand feeding is highly valued, the NH has
             Steinhauser et al., 2000). Many community-  a  “home-like”  environment  that  recognizes
             dwelling older adults and their families are   the importance of food in daily life and an
             unaware of EOL care options, unable to dif-  ACP process that includes family participa-
             ferentiate  between  (physician)  assisted  sui-  tion and palliative care options (Lopez et al.,
             cide  and  euthanasia,  misunderstand  the   2010). High-use NHs have insufficient assis-
             “double effect” in pain management, and do   tive staff at meal times and fear both aspira-
             not  understand  treatment  refusal  or  treat-  tion and noncompliance with regulations (in
             ment withdrawal (Silviera et al., 2000). Staff   regard  to  weight  loss).  Among  hospitalized
             and  family  in  NHs  and  assisted  living  set-  NH residents, lowest FT use was associated
             tings differ regarding the kind and quality   with White as compared with Black patients
             of EOL care that is, or should be, provided in   and  those  with  an  AD,  DNR  order,  and  no
             these settings (Cartwright, 2002). information   ANH orders (Teno et al., 2010).
             about ACP is not coming from physicians and   Although  the  most  common  reason  for
             other health care professionals (or the media)   approving insertion of a FT was that it would
             but  rather  from  personal  experience  with   prolong  life  and  prevent  aspiration,  only
             illness and death (Kahana, Dan, Kahana, &   40% of SDMs felt that it would improve the
             Kercher,  2004;  Lambert,  McColl,  Gilbert,  &   patient’s quality of life (Mitchell, Berkowitz,
             Wong, 2005).                             Lawson,  &  Lipsitz,  2000).  Most  SDMs  felt
                 Factors  that  facilitate  ACP  by  persons   they understood the benefits of a FT but not
             with  dementia  include  previous  discussion   the risks (83.0% vs. 48.9%), and less than half
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187