Page 347 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 347

314  n  NeuROBeHAvIORAL DeveLOPMeNT



           wellness. Primary components of the NSM   system (CNS) achieves maturity in form and
           include stressors, lines of defense and resis-  function.  Neurodevelopment  also  depends
   N       tance,  levels  of  prevention,  the  five  client   on the environment since CNS development
           systems variables (basic structure, interven-  occurs  through  an  “experience  expectant”
           tions,  internal  and  external  environment,   process  in  which  normal  species-typical
           and  reconstitution;  Neuman,  2001).  The   experiences  enable  the  CNS  to  make  the
           nurse  is  an  intervener  who  uses  three  lev-  structural  and  functional  changes  neces-
           els  of  prevention  (primary,  secondary,  and   sary  for  the  next  stages  of  development
           tertiary) to achieve the goal of reducing the   (Greenough, Black, & Wallace, 1987). In order
           client’s encounter with stressors and mitigat-  to balance the needs of the present develop-
           ing the impact of the stressor. The client or   mental  stage  and  the  anticipated  needs  of
           client system may be an individual, group,   subsequent stages, this process is somewhat
           family,  and  community  and  is  composed   plastic (Oppenheim, 1981). When an infant is
           of  five  interrelated  variables  (physiological,   placed in an atypical environment, such as
           psychological, sociocultural, developmental,   a  neonatal  intensive  care  unit,  ontogenetic
           and spiritual). Health, according to Neuman   adaptation  is  affected.  Although  the  infant
           (2001), is equated with living energy, deter-  may initially adapt successfully, changes in
           mined  by  the  degree  of  harmony  among   the trajectory of the infant’s neurobehavioral
           the five client variables and basic structure   developmental may be maladaptive at older
           factors,  on  a  continuum  from  wellness  to   ages.  The  effects  of  this  disturbance  vary
           illness.  The  degree  of  wellness  is  deter-  depending  on  the  timing  and  severity  of
           mined  by  the  amount  of  energy  required   environmental  stresses,  individual  genetic
           to retain, attain, or maintain system stabil-  background, the interaction of genetic back-
           ity  (Neuman,  2001,  p.  12).  An  integrative   ground  and  prenatal  history,  adaptations
           review  of  NSM-based  research  conducted   made  to  uterine  stresses,  and  specific  neu-
           by Fawcett and Giangrande (2001) found 200   rological  insults.  Infants  probably  develop
           research  reports  with  an  analysis  focused   normally  when  neural  plasticity—the  pro-
           on  general  information,  scientific  merit,   cess by which the brain develops new con-
           and  the  NSM.  Gigliotti  and  Fawcett  (2001)   nections after neural damage—compensates
           reviewed 212 research reports and identified   for abnormalities due to any atypical onto-
           different instruments explicitly linked to the   genetic adaptation and neurological insults.
           NSM—sometimes  more  than  once  and  for   Infants  exhibit  abnormal  neurobehavioral
           different purposes. To enhance and facilitate   development  when  neural  plasticity  is  not
           future research related to the NSM, Neuman   able  to  compensate  or  when  compensatory
           and Fawcett (2001) have established a set of   processes  result  in  structural  or  functional
           guidelines for NSM-based research.       changes that are maladaptive at later ages.
                                                        The  Synactive  Model  of  Neonatal
                             Patricia Hinton Walker  Behavioral  Organization  provides  a  frame-
                                                    work for exploring the concept of neurobe-
                                                    havioral  development.  Als  (1986)  and  Als,
                  Neurobehavioral                   Duffy, and McAnulty (1996) have proposed
                                                    a dynamic model for assessing infant behav-
                     developmeNt                    ioral  organization.  They  suggested  that  the
                                                    behavioral  organization  displayed  by  an
                                                    infant  is  a  reflection  of  the  infant’s  central
           Neurobehavioral  development  may  be    nervous  system  integrity,  defined  as  the
           viewed  as  a  genetically  determined  pro-  potential for the brain to develop normally.
           cess by which the primitive central nervous   The infants’ behaviors reflect subsystems of
   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352