Page 348 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 348

NeuROBeHAvIORAL DeveLOPMeNT  n  315



             functioning,  which  include  the  autonomic,   primary  expression  of  brain  functioning
             motor,  state,  attentional  or  interactive,  and   and  the  critical  route  for  communication
             regulatory  systems.  The  autonomic  system   with adults. Investigation of these behaviors   N
             controls physiologic functions that are basic   and  their  central  mechanisms  is  essential
             for  survival  such  as  respiration  and  heart   for  nursing  in  understanding  of  the  needs
             rate. The motor system involves muscle tone,   of  infants  and  in  planning  interventions  to
             infant movements, and posture. State organi-  improve their neurodevelopmental status.
             zation encompasses clarity of states and the   The  idea  of  evaluating  the  vitality  and
             pattern of transition from one state to another.   central nervous system integrity of a neonate
             The attentional or interactional system can be   by  assessing  sucking  is  not  new.  Nutritive
             observed only in the alert state and is indica-  sucking is initiated in utero and continues to
             tive of an infant’s ability to respond to visual   develop in an organized pattern in the early
             and auditory stimulation. An infant’s regula-  weeks after birth. It involves the integration
             tory system reflects the presence and success   of  multiple  sensory  and  motor  central  ner-
             of an infant’s efforts to achieve and maintain   vous system function (Wolff, 1968). Sucking
             a balance of these other subsystems.     behaviors  are  thought  to  be  an  excellent
                 Another framework used is the perspec-  barometer  of  central  nervous  system  orga-
             tive  of  developmental  science,  a  multidisci-  nization. They can be quantified in detailed
             plinary field that brings together researchers   analysis and are disturbed to various degrees
             and theorists from psychology, biology, nurs-  by neurologic problems.
             ing, and other disciplines (Cairns, 1996; Miles   The  work  of  Medoff-Cooper  and  col-
             & Holditch-Davis, 2003). In this perspective,   leagues  (Medoff-Cooper,  Bilker,  &  Kaplan,
             infants are viewed as developing in a contin-  2001;  Medoff-Cooper,  McGrath,  &  Shults,
             uously ongoing, reciprocal process of inter-  2002; Medoff-Cooper, McGrath, & Biler, 2000)
             action  with  the  environment.  Infants  and   demonstrated that changes in the pattern of
             their environments form a complex system,   nutritive sucking behaviors can be described
             consisting  of  elements  that  are  themselves   as  a  function  of  gestational  age  in  healthy
             systems, such as the mother and child, inter-  preterm and full-term infants. They reported
             acting together so that the total system shows   that sucking patterns change systematically
             less variability than that of the individual ele-  with  increasing  postmenstrual  and  gesta-
             ments. Moreover, plasticity is assumed to be   tional age, with a strong correlation between
             inherent in the infants, their families, and the   increasing  maturation  and  more  organized
             environment. Infants are active participants   sucking patterns (Medoff-Cooper et al., 2002).
             in  their  families  and  the  greater  environ-  When comparing sucking behaviors at term
             ment, constantly changing them at the same   of  213  extremely  early  born  infants  (gesta-
             time that the physical and social environment   tional age ≤29 weeks), more mature preterm
             is influencing the infant. Interactions, rather   infants  (30–32  weeks  gestational  age),  and
             than causation, are the focus of this perspec-  newly born term infants, sucking behaviors
             tive. No action of one element can be said to   were noted to be a function of gestational age
             cause the action of another because interac-  at birth and the interaction of maturation and
             tions  between  elements  are  simultaneous   experience.  extremely  early  born  preterm
             and  bidirectional.  The  interactions  affect-  infants demonstrated less competent feeding
             ing development of infants are too complex   behaviors than either more mature preterm
             to ever be totally identified, and infants can   infants or newly born full-term infants.
             achieve  the  same  developmental  outcomes   Lau,  Smith,  and  Schandler  (2003)  also
             through different processes.             found that with increasing postmenstrual age
                 Newborn behavior, which includes suck-  (PMA), preterm infants demonstrated signif-
             ing and sleeping and waking, is the infant’s   icant improvement in feeding performance.
   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353