Page 516 - Encyclopedia of Nursing Research
P. 516

SpIRITUAlITy  n  483



             newman’s (2008) theory of health as expand-  power as well as others, and religion as a way
             ing consciousness. presence, a nursing inter-  to organize spiritual beliefs and customs. A
             vention  for  spiritual  distress,  is  also  a  key   common element in many definitions of spir-  S
             aspect  of  newman’s  theory.  Jean  Watson   ituality is “connection with what is perceived
             (2008b) includes spirituality in caring theory   as sacred in life” (Thoresen, 2007, p. 5).
             and in the caritas processes associated with   Differentiating  spirituality  and  religi-
             the caring theory. The middle range Theory   osity is another important consideration for
             of  Self-Transcendence  (Reed,  2008)  reflects   those  interested  in  researching  spirituality.
               spirituality  in  both  the  assumptions  of  the   Religious  practices  may  be  components  of
             theory  (that  humans  are  pan-dimensional,   spirituality  as  well  as  supportive  nursing
             which  includes  “reaching  out  to  others,   interventions  for  enhancing  spiritual  well
             nature, and god,” p. 105) and in the descrip-  being, but defining spirituality solely in reli-
             tion of the transpersonal aspect of the major   gious  terms  excludes  nonreligious  people
             theoretical  concept  of  self-transcendence.   from  research  populations.  Attending  reli-
             Spirituality,  central  concept  in  the  middle   gious  services  or  participating  in  religious
             range theory of spiritual well-being in illness   activities may be more an indicator of physi-
             (O’Brien, 2008), focuses on finding spiritual   cal and social capabilities rather than a mea-
             meaning during illness experiences.      sure of spirituality.
                 nurse researchers interested in examin-  measuring spirituality presents another
             ing spirituality are faced with several chal-  set  of  challenges.  measurements  used  in
             lenges.  Because  spirituality  is  inherently   spirituality and health research are primar-
             subjective, one consideration is defining and   ily  self-report  scales  that  measure  either  a
             measuring spirituality as a research variable.   disposition  of  an  individual  to  be  spiritual
             Although  concept  analyses  on  “spiritual-  or  religious  or  the  function  of  spirituality
             ity” have identified attributes of spirituality   or religion in a person’s life (hill, 2005; hill,
             (Buck, 2006; emblen, 1992; Sessanna, Finnell,   Kopp,  &  Bollinger,  2007).  hill  (2005)  classi-
             & Jezewski, 2007; Tanyi, 2002) and the inclu-  fies disposition measures into four categories
             sion  of  “spiritual  distress,”  “spiritual  well-  and  functional  measures  into  eight  cate-
             being,” “spiritual health,” “spiritual growth   gories,  related  to  health-relevant  domains
             facilitation,”  and  “spiritual  support”  in  the   originally identified by the Fetzer Institute/
             nursing  diagnosis,  intervention,  and  out-  national Institute on Aging Working group
             comes  lexicon  (Johnson  et  al.,  2006),  it  can-  (1999).  Disposition  measures  include  scales
             not be assumed that spirituality means the   related  to  general  spirituality  or  religious-
             same  to  everyone.  For  example,  Burkhardt   ness, religious or spiritual commitment, reli-
             and  nagai-Jacobson  (2005)  discuss  inner   gious or spiritual development, and spiritual
             peace,  trust  in  the  ability  to  deal  with  life   or religious history. Functional measures are
             challenges,  interconnectedness  between  a   categorized as focusing on religious or spir-
             person and the sacred, nature, self, and oth-  itual  social  participation,  private  practices,
             ers as characteristics of spirituality. O’Brien   support,  coping,  beliefs  and  values,  moti-
             (2008)  includes  love,  compassion,  caring,   vating  forces,  techniques  for  regulating  or
             transcendence, a relationship with god, and   reconciling  relationships  (forgiveness),  and
             the connection of body, mind, and spirit as   religious or spiritual experiences. The Fetzer
             important features of spirituality. Stranahan   Institute  working  group  also  developed  a
             (2008) identified important attributes of spir-  multidimensional measure of religiousness/
             ituality as the need to find meaning and pur-  spirituality that includes both functional and
             pose in life, inner strength for coping with the   dispositional domains.
             present and hoping for the future, transcen-  establishing   causal   relationships
             dence  in  relationships  with  god  or  higher   between  spiritual  practices  and  changes
   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521