Page 793 - ACCCN's Critical Care Nursing
P. 793

770  A P P E N D I X   A   W O R L D   F E D E R AT I O N   O F   C R I T I C A L   C A R E   N U R S E S   P O S I T I O N   S TAT E M E N T S


         What are the causes of an unsafe ICU and             attributed  to  problems  of  communication  between  the
         how can we improve the safety culture and            physicians and nurses. Applying human factor engineer-
                                                              ing concepts to the study of the weak points of a specific
         environment within our intensive care units?         ICU  may  help  to  reduce  the  number  of  errors.  Errors
         Defining  and  assessing  safety  and  quality  are  only  one   should  not  be  considered  as  an  incurable  disease,  but
         side of the issue. Often in clinical practice the problem   rather  as  preventable  phenomena,  if  systems  were
         is broader than individual errors, and the whole system   designed  to  cope  and  to  minimize  the  effects  and  the
         is  at  fault  or  at  the  least  predisposes  to  an  unsafe   consequences of these errors. 43
         environment.  When  assessing  an  ‘unsafe’  ICU,  several
         factors  need  to  be  understood,  and  these  fit  into  two   The challenges for the future
         main  categories:  problems  with  the  organization  and   Medicine  in  the  last  200  years  has  changed  dramati-
         structure of the unit and problems with the process of   cally.  The  nature  of  health  and  disease  has  altered
         care  used.                                          irrevocably,  pain  has  been  conquered  with  anesthesia,
         Perhaps the most obvious factors from the organization   and  infectious  diseases  have  been  fought  through  a
         or structural point of view relate to the volume of work   combination of drugs and better public health systems.
         performed  and  outcome.  This  topic  remains  conten-  At the same time our understanding of the pathophysi-
              23
         tious ,  although  there  is  good  evidence  to  support   ological  process  underpinning  these  changes  has
         centralization and increased volume services in many cir-  improved  exponentially.  Despite  these  advancements,
         cumstances 24,25  (Nathens, 2001 no.10382). Some authors   our  knowledge  as  to  how  health-care  systems  interact
         have described the relationship between patient to nurse   and  influence  the  delivery  of  safe  and  quality  care  are
                                             26
         ratios  and  nosocomial  infection  rates ,  medication   poor. The recent ‘discovery’ of the epidemic of ‘medical
         errors,  complications and resource use after esophagec-  error’  as  an  important  cause  of  morbidity  and  mortal-
               20
              18
         tomy  or more broadly even all the aspects of safety and   ity  should  not  be  a  surprise.
         quality in the hospital.  These works lead many authors   The first step to overcome this preventable epidemic is by
                             27
         to conclude that a high-acuity nurse–patient ratio is cost-  the recognition of its existence. For this reason the ESICM
                28
         effective , and that it is crucial to have ICUs adequately   is promoting an initiative to bring together all the stake-
         staffed. 29                                          holders who relate to our specialty in a process aimed at
         The process of care relates to issues of teamwork, collabo-  not only raising the profile of patient safety, but to actu-
         ration  and  communication.  These  issues  are  far  more   ally improve the outcome of our patients.
         difficult to quantify and are often obscure and forgotten.
         In intensive care medicine they were perhaps first raised   Appendix 1
         by Pascale le Blanc and Wilmar Schaufeli in the EURICUS   1.  We, the Leaders of the Societies representing the
         studies. 30,31   They  demonstrated  these  variables  to  be   medical specialty of intensive care medicine, met
                                                         32
         associated with increasing nosocomial infection rates.      in Vienna on 11 October 2009. Together with the
         Among  these  aspects,  the  issue  of  nurse–physician  col-  representatives  of  the  main  institutions  and
         laboration in ICUs 33-35  seems to be crucial. Also, the issue   stakeholders  who  speak  up  for  patient  safety,
         of  the  transmission  of  individual  information  between   we declare:
                                           36
         professionals  is  today  a  critical  issue ,  first  raised  by   2.  We recognize that patient safety and clinical team
                                                         19
                        37
         Donchin in 1995  and later confirmed in the SEE study.      safety are of paramount importance to every prac-
         Notwithstanding these issues, it is important not to forget   ticing health professional and represents one of
                                          38
         the well-being of intensive care nurses  or the effect of a   the  major  challenges  in  modern  day  medicine.
         pharmacist’s and/or a nurse’s interventions on cost and     This affects the lives of women, men, and children
         adverse effects of drug therapy in the ICU. 39-41           in every country. Without a safe environment it is
                                                                     not possible to provide the quality of care that we
         The need for a multidimensional approach to the mini-
         mization  of  error  and  the  consequent  improvement  in   all  aspire  to.  This  is  especially  true  in  intensive
         the  clinical  and  economical  effectiveness  of  an  ICU     care medicine, given the very fragile nature of the
                                     42
         is  becoming  increasingly  clear.   When  comparing  the   patients we care for, often in the extremes of age,
         ‘most  efficient’  with  ‘least  efficient’  ICUs,  Rothen  and   unconscious and with minimal margins for error
         co-workers  demonstrated  that  only  interprofessional     imposed by their deranged physiology. This global
         rounds,  the  presence  of  an  emergency  department  and   problem requires a global solution.
         the geographical region of the hospital were significantly   3.  We believe that improving levels of safety for criti-
         asso ciated with improvement in quality indicators. The     cally ill patients is achievable in all units and in
         adoption of electronic prescribing over handwritten pre-    all countries, irrespective of the available resources.
         scription  has  also  been  shown  to  lead  to  the  prescrip-  If the safety of our patients is increased, then the
         tions  being  more  readable  and  complete,  with  fewer   quality of care that we can provide will improve.
         errors.  This  should  result  in  improved  prescribing  and   4.  We strongly believe that increasing patient safety
         a  safer  environment  for  the  giving  of  drugs  to  our   is as crucial to the development of medical prac-
         patients.                                                   tice  as  the  increase  in  the  effectiveness  of  our
                                                                     interventions.
         In conclusion, a significant number of dangerous human   5.  We have today therefore pledged to do whatever
         errors  occur  in  the  ICU.  Many  of  these  errors  can  be   is necessary to:
   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798