Page 119 - Hematology_ Basic Principles and Practice ( PDFDrive )
P. 119

90    Part I  Molecular and Cellular Basis of Hematology


        in vitro. The in vitro results with the TK, JAK2, and ALK inhibitors   chemistry-based  approaches  to  biologic  pathway  perturbations  are
        were  confirmed  in  mouse  xenograft  models,  when  patient-derived   likely to accelerate the discovery of pharmacogenomics mechanisms.
        Ph-like ALL cells were exposed to respective inhibitors based on the   The outputs of such studies will advance understanding of the phar-
        genetic profile of the leukemia cells. 28             macology  of  existing  medications  and  will  help  to  identify  genes
           In summary, this provides evidence that kinase-activating genetic   and  pathways  involved  in  drug  resistance  and  novel  therapeutic
        alterations are biologically relevant drivers in Ph-like ALL, and that   targets.
        the genetic signature can help to select drugs such as TKIs, JAK2   One important consideration in modern medicine is that clinically
        or ALK inhibitors. However, rapid molecular profiling is needed to   useful approaches must also be cost effective. About a decade ago,
        identify  potentially  actionable  mutations  in  patients  with  Ph-like   the cost for the first full human genome sequence was approximately
        ALL, and additional prospective trials are needed to establish their   US$3 billion; this cost is now (2015) about US$1000. The markedly
        benefit in the clinical setting. In contrast to children, outcomes in   lower  cost  for  robust  genotyping  points  to  an  exciting  future  for
        ALL have not improved significantly during recent decades in the   genomics and pharmacogenomics research and translation, suggesting
        AYA cohort; and as Ph-like ALL is the most common subtype in   that the current approach to selecting medications (often “trial and
        AYAs, the introduction of signaling pathway inhibitors may be an   error”) will continue to evolve into more scientific-based methods for
        attractive strategy to improve outcome in these patients who have   selecting the optimal medications and doses for individual patients—
        been therapeutically neglected for too long.          with  genomics  playing  an  increasing  role  in  such  therapeutic
                                                              decisions. As pharmacoggenomics research expands the number of
                                                              robust  associations  between  genome  variation  and  drug  response,
        FUTURE DIRECTIONS                                     the challenges of successful clinical translation and implementation
                                                              will be hurdle that will need to be overcome for precision medicine
        Pharmacogenomics has already proven to be an important approach   is to become a reality. 31
        to improve drug therapy, and as of March 2015 the FDA has included
        information on pharmacogenomic biomarkers in the labels of more
        than 130 medications. A full list of these medications and further   REFERENCES
        details are available on the FDA’s website (see Table 8.1). There is,
        however, a relatively slow pace of translating pharmacogenomics into   1.  Evans WE, Relling MV: Moving towards individualized medicine with
        clinical  practice.  Laboratory  tests  (e.g.,  liver  and  kidney  function   pharmacogenomics. Nature 429(6990):464–468, 2004.
        tests) are widely used to adjust drug dosages, but even though tech-  2.  Chhibber  A,  Kroetz  DL,  Tantisira  KG,  et al:  Genomic  architecture
        nology for testing relevant pharmacogenomic biomarkers is widely   of  pharmacological  efficacy  and  adverse  events.  Pharmacogenomics
        available, simple, robust, and inexpensive genotyping tests are rarely   15(16):2025–2048, 2014.
        used to optimize drug therapy. As of 2015 only five institutions in   3.  Ivanov  M,  Barragan  I,  Inglman-Sundberg  M:  Epigenetic  mechanisms
        the United States are routinely performing “preemptive genotyping”   of importance for drug treatment. Trends Pharmacol Sci 35(8):384–396,
        for pharmacogenomic traits to guide the optimal selection of medica-  2014.
        tions and their dosage. Because genotyping at the time of prescribing   4.  Hunt RC, Simhadri VL, Indoli M, et al: Exposing synonymous muta-
        is  compromised  by  the  relatively  long  delay  until  genotype  results   tions. Trends Genet 30(7):308–321, 2014.
        are available, prospective genotyping early in a person’s life or at the   5.  Diouf  B,  Crews  C,  Lew  G,  et al:  Association  of  an  inherited  genetic
        time of initial illness is a more efficient and cost-effective approach.   variant with vincristine-related peripheral neuropathy in children with
        In addition, because a person’s germline genotype does not change   acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA 313(8):815–823, 2015.
        over a lifetime, it only needs to be done once. As genotyping becomes   6.  Rukov JL, Wilentzik R, Jaffe I, et al: Pharmaco-miR: linking microRNAs
        faster and cheaper, it is anticipated that this issue may no longer be   and drug effects. Brief Bioinform 15(4):648–659, 2014.
        an obstacle. In addition, educative and legislative initiatives, and the   7.  He Y, Hoskins JM, McLeod HL: Copy number variants in pharmaco-
        implementation  of  user-friendly  decision-support  systems  (e.g.,  as   genetic genes. Trends Mol Med 17(5):244–251, 2011.
        realized  in  the  “Clinical  implementation  of  pharmacogenomics—  8.  Diouf  B,  Cheng  Q,  Krynetskaia  N,  et al:  Somatic  deletions  of  genes
                                                      29
        PG4KDS protocol” at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital)  will   regulating  MSH2  protein  stability  cause  DNA  mismatch  repair
        help to make pharmacogenomic biomarkers a routine part of clinical   deficiency  and  drug  resistance  in  human  leukemia  cells.  Nat  Med
        care.                                                    17(10):1298–1303, 2011.
           The recent unprecedented gain of insights into the human genome   9.  Manalio TA: Bringing genome-wide association findings into clinical use.
        and  genomic  variations  among  individuals  has  already  changed   Nature Rev Genet 14:549–558, 2013.
        the  practice  of  medicine.  High-throughput  technologies,  such  as   10.  Relling MV, Gardner EE, Sandborn WJ, et al: Clinical Pharmacogenetics
        hybridization-based  microarray  approaches  and  next-generation   Implementation Consortium guidelines for thiopurine methyltransferase
        sequencing  technologies,  are  available  for  genome-wide  analyses   genotype  and  thiopurine  dosing:  2013  update.  Clin  Pharmacol  Ther
        of  genomic  variants,  gene  expression  patterns,  epigenetic  patterns,   93(4):324–325, 2013.
        and  proteomic  and  metabonomic  profiles.  Moreover,  sophisticated   11.  Yang  SK,  Hong  M,  Baek  J,  et al:  A  common  missense  variant  in
        methods  have  been  developed  to  integrate  these  data  in  order  to   NUDT15 confers susceptibility to thiopurine-induced leucopenia. Nat
        uncover  genotype–phenotype  interactions,  and  some  of  the  most   Genet 46(9):1017–1020, 2014.
                                                         30
        important methods are metadimensional and multistaged analyses.    12.  Yang  JJ,  Landier  W,  Yang  W,  et al:  Inherited  NUDT15  variant  is  a
        The recent application of these genome-wide tools has already yielded   genetic  determinant  of  mercaptopurin  intolerance  in  children  with
        novel insights into drug actions and led to important drug discoveries.  acute  lymphoblastic  leukemia.  J  Clin  Oncol  2015.  doi:  10.1200/
           Moreover,  these  tools  are  being  used  to  elucidate  differences   JCO.2014.59.4671.
        between genomes of normal cells and cancer cells (e.g., the Pediatric   13.  Tzoneva G, Perez-Garcia A, Carpenter Z, et al: Activating mutations in
        Cancer  Genome  Project;  see  Table  8.1),  and  this  knowledge  has   the NT5C2 nucleotidase gene drive chemotherapy resistance in relapsed
        the  potential  to  illuminate  paths  toward  novel  prognostic  markers   ALL. Nat Med 19(3):368–371, 2013.
        (those that can be used for risk stratification in clinical trials) and/  14.  Meyer JA, Wang J, Hogan LE, et al: Relapse specific mutations in NT5C2
        or novel therapeutic targets (those that can be used to discover new   in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 45(3):290–294,
        medications).                                            2013.
           Once  novel  candidate  genes  have  been  identified  via  GWA   15.  Pirmohamed  M,  Kamali  F,  Daly  AK,  et al:  Oral  anticoagulation:  a
        studies,  functional  investigations  such  as  systematic  mutagenesis,   critique  of  recent  advances  and  controversies.  Trends  Pharmacol  Sci
        RNA  interference,  and  genome-wide  CRISPR/Cas9  knockouts   36(2):153–163, 2015.
        or  enhancement  of  gene  expression,  use  of  overexpression  systems   16.  Nigam SK: What do drug transporters really do? Nat Rev Drug Discov
        (cDNA, open-reading frame and miRNA expression libraries), and   14:29–44, 2015.
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124