Page 1703 - Hall et al (2015) Principles of Critical Care-McGraw-Hill
P. 1703

4       References


                      96. Schreiber MA, Aoki N, Scott BG, Beck JR. Determinants of   decision tree analysis and logistic regression.  J Neurosurg.
                        mortality in patients with severe blunt head injury. Arch Surg.   August 2002;97(2):326-336.
                        March 2002;137(3):285-290.                           113. Rosner MJ, Daughton S. Cerebral perfusion pressure manage-
                      97. Saul TG, Ducker TB. Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring   ment in head injury.  J Trauma. August 1990;30(8):933-940;
                        and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J   discussion 940-941.
                        Neurosurg. April 1982;56(4):498-503.                 114. Robertson CS, Valadka AB, Hannay HJ, et al. Prevention of sec-
                      98. Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, Marshall LF,   ondary ischemic insults after severe head injury. Crit Care Med.
                        Walker MD. High-dose barbiturate control of elevated intracra-  October 1999;27(10):2086-2095.
                        nial pressure in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg.     115. Contant CF, Valadka AB, Gopinath SP, Hannay HJ, Robertson
                        July 1988;69(1):15-23.                                  CS. Adult respiratory distress syndrome: a complication of
                      99. Howells T, Elf K, Jones PA, et al. Pressure reactivity as a guide   induced hypertension after severe head injury.  J Neurosurg.
                        in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with   October 2001;95(4):560-568.
                        brain trauma. J Neurosurg. February 2005;102(2):311-317.    116. White H, Venkatesh B. Cerebral perfusion pressure in neu-
                      100. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM,   rotrauma: a review.  Anesth Analg. September 2008;107(3):
                        Eisenberg HM. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy   979-988.
                        for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg.     117. Pietropaoli JA, Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Wald SL, Schmoker
                        April 2006;104(4):469-479.                              JD, Zhuang J. The deleterious effects of intraoperative hypoten-
                      101. Servadei F, Antonelli V, Giuliani G, Fainardi E, Chieregato A,   sion on outcome in patients with severe head injuries. J Trauma.
                        Targa L. Evolving lesions in traumatic subarachnoid hemor-  September 1992;33(3):403-407.
                        rhage: prospective study of 110 patients with emphasis on the     118. Sorrentino E, Diedler J, Kasprowicz M, et al. Critical thresh-
                        role of ICP monitoring. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:81-82.  olds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury.
                      102. Lee TT, Galarza M, Villanueva PA. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI)   Neurocrit Care. April 2012;16(2):258-266.
                        is not associated with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Acta     119. Steiner  LA,  Czosnyka  M,  Piechnik  SK,  et  al.  Continuous
                        Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(1):41-46.                    monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows deter-
                      103. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-  mination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients
                        pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med.   with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. April 2002;30(4):
                        2012;327(26):2471-2481.                                 733-738.
                      104. Mendelow AD, Teasdale GM, Russell T, Flood J, Patterson J,     120. Kety SS, Schmidt CF. The determination of cerebral blood flow
                        Murray GD. Effect of mannitol on cerebral blood flow and   in man by the use of nitrous oxide in low concentrations. Am J
                        cerebral perfusion pressure in human head injury. J Neurosurg.   Physiol. 1945;143:53-66.
                        July 1985;63(1):43-48.                               121. Hoedt-Rasmussen K, Sveinsdottir E, Lassen NA. Regional cere-
                      105. Roberts I. Barbiturates for acute traumatic brain injury.   bral blood flow in man determined by intra-arterial injection of
                        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000033.          radioactive inert gas. Circ Res. March 1966;18(3):237-247.
                      106. Hsiang JK, Chesnut RM, Crisp CB, Klauber MR, Blunt BA,     122. Coles JP, Fryer TD, Smielewski P, et al. Incidence and mecha-
                        Marshall LF. Early, routine paralysis for intracranial pressure   nisms of cerebral ischemia in early clinical head injury. J Cereb
                        control in severe head injury: is it necessary? Crit Care Med.   Blood Flow Metab. February 2004;24(2):202-211.
                        September 1994;22(9):1471-1476.                      123. Wintermark M, Sesay M, Barbier E, et al. Comparative over-
                      107. Vender J, Waller J, Dhandapani K, McDonnell D. An evalua-  view of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke. September
                        tion and comparison of intraventricular, intraparenchymal, and   2005;36(9):e83-e99.
                        fluid-coupled techniques for intracranial pressure monitoring     124. Barazangi N, Hemphill JC, III. Advanced cerebral monitor-
                        in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.  J Clin Monit   ing in neurocritical care.  Neurol India.  October-December
                        Comput. August 2011;25(4):231-236.                      2008;56(4):405-414.
                      108. Kasotakis G, Michailidou M, Bramos A, et al. Intraparenchymal     125. Vajkoczy P, Roth H, Horn P, et al. Continuous monitoring
                        vs extracranial ventricular drain intracranial pressure monitors   of regional cerebral blood flow: experimental and clinical
                        in  traumatic  brain  injury: less is  more? J Am Coll Surg.  June   validation of a novel thermal diffusion microprobe. J Neurosurg.
                        2012;214(6):950-957.                                    August 2000;93(2):265-274.
                      109. Chovanes GI, Richards RM. The predominance of metabolic     126. Marion DW, Darby J, Yonas H. Acute regional cerebral blood
                        regulation of cerebral blood flow and the lack of “Classic” auto-  flow changes caused by severe head injuries. J Neurosurg. March
                        regulation curves in the viable brain. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:12.  1991;74(3):407-414.
                      110. Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP. Relationship between cardiac output     127. Robertson C. Desaturation episodes after severe head injury:
                        and cerebral blood flow in patients with intact and with impaired   influence on outcome.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993;59:
                        autoregulation. J Neurosurg. September 1990;73(3):368-374.  98-101.
                      111. Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP, Bandoh K, Marmarou A. Blood pres-    128. Robertson CS, Gopinath SP, Goodman JC, Contant CF, Valadka
                        sure and intracranial pressure-volume dynamics in severe head   AB, Narayan RK. SjvO 2 monitoring in head-injured patients.
                        injury: relationship with cerebral blood flow. J Neurosurg. July   J Neurotrauma. October 1995;12(5):891-896.
                        1992;77(1):15-19.                                    129. Schneider  GH, von Helden A,  Lanksch WR, Unterberg A.
                      112. Andrews PJ, Sleeman DH, Statham PF, et al. Predicting recovery   Continuous monitoring of jugular bulb oxygen saturation in
                        in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admis-  comatose  patients—therapeutic  implications.  Acta Neurochir
                        sion  variables  and  physiological  data:  a comparison  between   (Wien). 1995;134(1-2):71-75.








              Section10-O-Ref.indd   4                                                                                   1/21/2015   11:30:11 AM
   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708