Page 210 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 210

P1: PIG/  P2: OYK/
                   0521861241c04  CB996/Velleman  October 20, 2005  2:54  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                   196                        Relations
                                   3. Suppose R is a total order and b is a minimal element of B. Let x be an
                                     arbitrary element of B.If x = b, then since R is reflexive, bRx. Now suppose
                                     x  = b. Since R is a total order, we know that either xRb or bRx. But xRb
                                     can’t be true, since by combining xRb with our assumption that x  = b we
                                     could conclude that b is not minimal, thereby contradicting our assumption
                                     that it is minimal. Thus, bRx must be true. Since x was arbitrary, we can
                                     conclude that ∀x ∈ B(bRx), so b is the smallest element of B.


                                     When comparing subsets of some set A, mathematicians often use the
                                   partial order S ={(X, Y) ∈ P (A) × P (A) | X ⊆ Y}, although this is not al-
                                   ways made explicit. Recall that if F ⊆ P (A) and X ∈ F, then according to
                                   Definition 4.4.4, X is the S-smallest element of F iff ∀Y ∈ F(X ⊆ Y). In other
                                   words, to say that an element of F is the smallest element means that it is a
                                   subset of every element of F. Similarly, mathematicians sometimes talk of a
                                   set being the smallest one with a certain property. Generally this means that
                                   the set has the property in question, and furthermore it is a subset of every set
                                   that has the property. For example, we might describe our conclusion in part
                                   3 of Example 4.4.5 by saying that {2, 3} is the smallest set X ⊆ N with the
                                   property that 2 ∈ X and 3 ∈ X. We will see more examples of this idea in the
                                   next section and in later chapters.

                                   Example 4.4.7.
                                   1. Find the smallest set of real numbers X such that 5 ∈ X and for all real
                                     numbers x and y,if x ∈ X and x < y then y ∈ X.
                                   2. Find the smallest set of real numbers X such that X  = ∅ and for all real
                                     numbers x and y,if x ∈ X and x < y then y ∈ X.

                                   Solutions

                                   1. Another way to phrase the question would be to say that we are looking
                                     for the smallest element of the family of sets F ={X ⊆ R | 5 ∈ X and
                                     ∀x∀y((x ∈ X ∧ x < y) → y ∈ X)}, where it is understood that smallest
                                     means smallest with respect to the subset partial order. Now for any set X ∈
                                     F we know that 5 ∈ X, and we know that ∀x∀y((x ∈ X ∧ x < y) → y ∈
                                     X). In particular, since 5 ∈ X we can say that ∀y(5 < y → y ∈ X). Thus,
                                     if we let A ={y ∈ R | 5 ≤ y}, then we can conclude that ∀X ∈ F(A ⊆ X).
                                     But it is easy to see that A ∈ F,so A is the smallest element of F.
                                   2. We must find the smallest element of the family of sets F ={X ⊆ R | X  =
                                     ∅ and ∀x∀y((x ∈ X ∧ x < y) → y ∈ X)}. The set A ={y ∈ R | 5 ≤ y}
                                     from part 1 is an element of F, but it is not the smallest element, or even a
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215