Page 253 - HOW TO PROVE IT: A Structured Approach, Second Edition
P. 253

P1: Oyk/
                   0521861241c05  CB996/Velleman  October 19, 2005  0:16  0 521 86124 1  Char Count= 0






                                                  One-to-one and Onto                  239
                            5. This function is both one-to-one and onto. The verification that h is one-
                               to-one is very similar to the verification in solution 4 that g is one-to-
                               one, and it is left to the reader. To see that h is onto, we must show that
                               ∀y ∈ R∃x ∈ R(h(x) = y). Here is a brief proof of this statements. Let y
                               be an arbitrary real number. Let x = (y − 3)/2. Then g(x) = 2x + 3 =
                               2 · ((y − 3)/2) + 3 = y − 3 + 3 = y. Thus, ∀y ∈ R∃x ∈ R(h(x) = y), so
                               h is onto.


                              Although the definition of one-to-one is easiest to understand when it is
                            stated as a negative statement, as in Definition 5.2.1, we know from Chapter 3
                            that the definition will be easier to use in proofs if we reexpress it as an
                            equivalent positive statement. The following theorem shows how to do this. It
                            also gives a useful equivalence for the definition of onto.

                            Theorem 5.2.3. Suppose f : A → B.

                            1. f is one-to-one iff ∀a 1 ∈ A∀a 2 ∈ A( f (a 1 ) = f (a 2 ) → a 1 = a 2 ).
                            2. f is onto iff Ran( f ) = B.

                            Proof
                            1. We use the rules from Chapters 1 and 2 for reexpressing negative statements
                               as positive ones.
                                   f is one-to-one iff ¬∃a 1 ∈ A∃a 2 ∈ A( f (a 1 ) = f (a 2 ) ∧ a 1  = a 2 )
                                               iff ∀a 1 ∈ A∀a 2 ∈ A¬( f (a 1 ) = f (a 2 ) ∧ a 1  = a 2 )
                                               iff ∀a 1 ∈ A∀a 2 ∈ A( f (a 1 )  = f (a 2 ) ∨ a 1 = a 2 )
                                               iff ∀a 1 ∈ A∀a 2 ∈ A( f (a 1 ) = f (a 2 ) → a 1 = a 2 ).

                            2. First we relate the definition of onto to the definition of range.
                                             f is onto iff ∀b ∈ B∃a ∈ A( f (a) = b)
                                                    iff ∀b ∈ B∃a ∈ A((a, b) ∈ f )
                                                    iff ∀b ∈ B(b ∈ Ran( f ))
                                                    iff B ⊆ Ran( f ).

                            Now we are ready to prove part 2 of the theorem.
                              (→) Suppose f is onto. By the equivalence just derived we have B ⊆
                            Ran( f ), and by the definition of range we have Ran( f ) ⊆ B. Thus, it follows
                            that Ran( f ) = B.
                              (←) Suppose Ran( f ) = B. Then certainly B ⊆ Ran( f ), so by the equiva-
                            lence, f is onto.
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258