Page 947 - How to Make Money in Stocks Trilogy
P. 947

196  Appendix A


           the lights on in this business; this past decade saw many mergers, while
           other firms just disappeared.
             So how is it that our firm, William O’Neil + Company, has survived for
           five decades with its portfolio intact and growing? How has our firm not
           only kept its lights on but expanded to cover global markets, with offices in
           Los Angeles, New York, Boston, and London? Because, since 1964, our
           time-tested methodology has guided us profitably in our portfolios and
           proven applicable to markets around the world.
             I want to be clear: we do not think that we are smarter than anyone else
           in the business. But what we do better than most is observe the market’s
           action and react according to a set of well-defined, historically proven rules.
           Those market rules—based on a half-century of studying the characteristics
           and behavior of rising and falling individual stocks and stock markets—
           encompass market directional analysis, stock picking, and portfolio manage-
           ment. For long-term success, you have to be good at all three—and not be
           satisfied with exceling at only one or two.
             Many of our rules sound contrarian to investors who do not use stock
           charts and thus do not treat the market as the pure supply and demand
           mechanism that it is. For example, our research shows that many stocks will
           top while their quarterly earnings are still increasing. Therefore, you can’t
           rely on fundamentals to determine when to sell. You must consult a chart
           and monitor the technicals, as a stock’s breakdown in price usually precedes
           the breakdown of fundamentals.
             Another cornerstone of our method is keeping losses to 7 to 8%. What
           would have happened if most investors had cut their losses at 7% in
           2000–2001, as the market was imploding? Or, even better, if they had used
           some of our stock-selling rules that would have locked in gains during the
           first three months of 2000? A few years later, dark clouds were again gath-
           ering on the horizon, and I remember closing all of my long positions in
           November 2007—well ahead of the devastating 2008 break. In fact, all of
           our portfolio managers saw the mounting institutional selling (distribution)
           on the major indexes and quickly exited the market. We sat on the sidelines
           in cash as the S&P 500 fell more than 50%.
             Operating in the stock market, for most people, is an exercise in
           extremes. When it’s good—it’s great—when it’s bad—it’s terrible. Our
           method helps keep us from getting caught up in the extremes that eventu-
           ally may bring down individual investors and cause even the best institu-
   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952