Page 54 - TI Journal 18-1

48 TATE

117(7):1623-1629; 2006. A.; Golier, J.; Yehuda, R. Brain stimulation in post-
49. Mondino, M.; Haesebaert, F.; Poulet, E.; Suaud- traumatic stress disorder. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol.
Chagny, M. F.; Brunelin, J. Fronto-temporal 2; 2011.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) 58. O’Connell, N. E.; Wand, B. M.; Marston, L.;
reduces source-monitoring deficits and auditory Spencer, S.; Desouza, L. H. Non-invasive
hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.
Schizophr. Res. 161(2-3):515-516; 2015. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4:CD008208; 2014.
50. Moon, C. M.; Jeong, G. W. Brain morphological 59. O’Reardon, J. P.; Solvason, H. B.; Janicak, P.
alterations and cellular metabolic changes in G.; Sampson, S.; Isenberg, K. E.; Nahas, Z.;
patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a McDonald, W. M.; Avery, D.; Fitzgerald, P.
combined DARTEL-based VBM and (1)H-MRS B.; Loo, C.; Demitrack, M. A.; George, M. S.;
study. J. Magn. Reson. Im. 34(4):429-436; 2016. Sackeim, H. A. Efficacy and safety of transcra-
51. Mori, F.; Codecà, C.; Kusayanagi, H.; Monteleone, nial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment
F.; Buttari, F.; Fiore, S.; Bernardi, G.; Koch, G.; of major depression: a multisite randomized
Centonze, D. Effects of anodal transcranial direct controlled trial. Biol. Psychiatry 62(11):1208-
current stimulation on chronic neuropathic 1216; 2007.
pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Pain 60. Palm, U.; Keeser, D.; Blautzik, J.; Pogarell,
11(5):436-442; 2010. O.; Ertl-Wagner, B.; Kupka, M. J.; Reiser, M.;
52. Nitsche, M. A.; Paulus, W. Excitability changes Padberg, F. Prefrontal transcranial direct current
induced in the human motor cortex by weak stimulation (tDCS) changes negative symptoms
transcranial direct current stimulation. J. and functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) in a
Physiol. 527(3):633-639; 2000. single case of treatment-resistant schizophre-
53. Nitsche, M. A.; Fricke, K.; Henschke, U.; nia. Schizophr. Res. 150(2-3):583-585; 2013.
Schlitterlau, A.; Liebetanz, D.; Lang, N.; Henning, 61. Paus, T. Imaging the brain before, during,
S.; Tergau, F.; Paulus, W. Pharmacological mod- and after transcranial magnetic stimula-
ulation of cortical excitability shifts induced tion. Neuropsychologia 37(2):219-224; 1999.
by transcranial direct current stimulation in 62. Plis, S. M.; Weisend, M. P.; Damaraju, E.; Eichele,
humans. J. Physiol. 553(Pt 1):293-301; 2003. T.; Mayer, A.; Clark, V. P.; Lane, T.; Calhoun,
54. Nitsche, M. A.; Jaussi, W.; Liebetanz, D.; Lang, N.; V. D. Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI
Tergau, F.; Paulus, W. Consolidation of human and MEG data collected under identical par-
motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserin adigms. Comput. Biol. Med. 41(12):1156-1165;
e. Neuropsychopharmacology 29(8):1573-1578; 2011.
2004. 63. Polanía, R.; Nitsche, M. A.; Paulus, W. Modulating
55. Nitsche, M. A.; Niehaus, L.; Hoffmann, K. T.; functional connectivity patterns and topological
Hengst, S.; Liebetanz, D.; Paulus, W.; Meyer, B. functional organization of the human brain with
U. MRI study of human brain exposed to weak transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum.
direct current stimulation of the frontal cor- Brain Mapp. 32(8):1236-1249; 2011.
tex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115(10):2419-2423; 64. Prehn, K.; Flöel, A. Potentials and limits to
2004. enhance cognitive functions in healthy and
56. Nitsche, M. A.; Cohen, L. G.; Wassermann, E. pathological aging by tDCS. Front. Cell. Neurosci.
M.; Priori, A.; Lang, N.; Antal, A.; Paulus, W.; 9:355; 2015.
Hummel, F.; Boggio, P. S.; Fregni, F.; Pascual- 65. Quarantelli, M. MRI/MRS in neuroinflamma-
Leone, A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: tion: methodology and applications. Clin. Transl.
state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 1(3):206-223; Imaging 3(6):475-489; 2015.
2008. 66. Raichle, M. E.; MacLeod, A. M.; Snyder, A. Z.;
57. Novakovic, V.; Sher, L.; Lapidus, K. A.; Mindes, J. Powers, W. J.; Gusnard, D. A.; Shulman, G. L. A