Page 52 - TI Journal 18-1

46 TATE

11. Broyd, S. J.; Demanuele, C.; Debener, S.; Helps, A. Effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation
S. K.; James, C. J.; Sonuga-Barke, E. J. Default- on resting state brain activity. Brain. Behav.
mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: 2(3):211-220; 2012.
a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobeh. Rev. 20. Filmer, H. L.; Dux, P. E.; Mattingley,
33(3):279-296; 2009. J.B. Applications of transcranial direct current
12. Brunelin, J.; Mondino, M.; Gassab, L.; Haesebaert, stimulation for understanding brain func-
F.; Gaha, L.; Suaud-Chagny, M. F.; Saoud, M.; tion. Trends Neurosci. 37(12):742-753; 2014.
Mechri, A.; Poulet, E. Examining transcranial 21. Floel, A.; Cohen, L. G. Recovery of function in
direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treat- humans: cortical stimulation and pharmaco-
ment for hallucinations in schizophrenia. Am. logical treatments after stroke. Neurobiol. Dis.
J. Psychiatry 169(7):719-724; 2012. 37(2):243-251; 2010.
13. Brunoni, A. R.; Amadera, J.; Berbel, B.; Volz, 22. Fox, M. D.; Halko, M. A.; Eldaief, M. C.; Pascual-
M. S.; Rizzerio, B. G.; Fregni, F. A systematic Leone, A. Measuring and manipulating brain
review on reporting and assessment of adverse connectivity with resting state functional
effects associated with transcranial direct cur- connectivity magnetic resonance imaging
rent stimulation. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation
14(8):1133-1145; 2011. (TMS). Neuroimage 62(4):2232-2243; 2012.
14. Brunoni, A. R.; Shiozawa, P.; Truong, D.; Javitt, D. 23. Fraser, M. A.; Shaw, M. E.; Cherbuin, N. A sys-
C.; Elkis, H.; Fregni, F.; Bikson, M. Understanding tematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal
tDCS effects in schizophrenia: a systematic hippocampal atrophy in healthy human ageing.
review of clinical data and an integrated com- Neuroimage 112:364-374; 2015.
putation modeling analysis. Expert Rev. Med. 24. Gilula, M. F. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation
Devices 11(4):383-394; 2014. and fibromyalgia. Expert Rev. Med. Devices.
15. Bullard, L. M.; Browning, E. S.; Clark, V. P.; 4(4):489-495; 2007.
Coffman, B. A.; Garcia, C. M.; Jung, R. E.; van 25. Goldenberg, D.; Galván, A. The use of functional
der Merwe, A. J.; Paulson, K. M.; Vakhtin, A. and effective connectivity techniques to under-
A.; Wootton, C. L.; Weisend, M. P. Transcranial stand the developing brain. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.
direct current stimulation’s effect on novice 12:155-164; 2015.
versus experienced learning. Exp. Brain Res. 26. Gudayol-Ferré, E.; Peró-Cebollero, M.; González-
213(1):9-14; 2011. Garrido, A. A.; Guàrdia-Olmos, J. Changes in
16. Bystritsky, A.; Kerwin, L.; Feusner, J. A pilot brain connectivity related to the treatment of
study of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for depression measured through fMRI: a systematic
generalized anxiety disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9; 2015.
69(3):412-417; 2008. 27. Hemington, K. S.; Wu, Q.; Kucyi, A.; Inman,
17. Coffman, B. A.; Trumbo, M. C.; Clark, V. R. D.; Davis, K. D. Abnormal cross-network
P. Enhancement of object detection with tran- functional connectivity in chronic pain and its
scranial direct current stimulation is associated association with clinical symptoms. Brain Struct.
with increased attention. BMC Neurosci. 13:108; Func. 1-7; 2015.
2012. 28. Hill, A. T.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Hoy, K. E. Effects of
18. Cvetkovic, D.; Cosic, I. Alterations of human anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
electroencephalographic activity caused by mul- on working memory: a systematic review and
tiple extremely low frequency magnetic field meta-analysis of findings from healthy and neu-
exposures. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 47(10):1063- ropsychiatric populations. Brain Stimul. 2015.
1073; 2009. 29. Irimia, A.; Van Horn, J. D. Functional neuro-
19. Feusner, J. D.; Madsen, S.; Moody, T.D.; Bohon, imaging of traumatic brain injury: advances
C.; Hembacher, E.; Bookheimer, S. Y.; Bystritsky, and clinical utility. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat.