Page 29 - T-I JOURNAL19 4
P. 29

676   SOHAR ET AL.                           GENDER DATA GAP                                677



 utility patent category, we find a marked difference  For example, 61% of men and just 46% of women     innovation based on gender?  kept intentionally short in the hopes of increasing
 in women’s participation across technologies, with  holding STEM doctoral degrees work in research   2.  What are the barriers that prevent collection   participation and was introduced through an email
 more women inventors named on chemical patents  and development positions (22).    of data by gender on participation rates in com-  providing the survey link and a brief introduction
 than electrical or mechanical patents” (9). In their    Frietsch et al. (19) find that, internationally, the     mercialization activity?  about the AUTM/WIC and the WIC/MSC and its
 international analysis, Frietsch et al. note low shares  relative contribution of women between 2003 and   3.  What are industry standard software programs   mission. Survey Monkey® was used to collect and
 of female patenting in the U.S. in the top two fields  2005—averaged across all technological fields—is      available for monitoring technology transfer   monitor data.
 of pharmaceuticals and basic chemicals and found  highest in Spain (12.3%), followed by France (10.2%)     activities?    A master member list was obtained from the
 that, overall, the U.S. comes in below the interna-  and a group of countries with similar levels (of more   AUTM Metrics Committee, and the WIC/MSC sur-
 tional average in female patentees (19).   than 8%) consisting of Denmark, Australia, the U.S.,   Research Design  vey was open from October 6 to October 16, 2015.
   In IT fields, the overall level of female participation  Belgium, and Sweden. At the lower end of the scale     Survey research was determined to be the best  The survey was sent to 189 university TTOs in the
 in IT patents remains low; however, recent trends are  are Germany (4.7%) and Austria (3.2%). The gen-  method suited to this type of inquiry. In order to  U.S. After this time, offices that had not responded
 promising. While women held only 2% of all IT pat-  eral trend over time has been a strong increase in   develop a better understanding of how TTOs col-  to the survey were identified, and each WIC/MSC
 ents in 1980, the share increased to approximately 6%  women’s contributions to technology output in   lect and utilize demographic information for their  committee member received a number of TTOs with
 in 2005 and 8% in 2010. Women’s patenting patterns  most countries, but it is still at a relatively low level.   inventors, data and information was gathered from  which to follow-up. Preference was placed on dis-
 differ widely from one organization to another. For  Female contributions are highest in pharmaceutical   study participants using surveys (conducted either  tributing university TTOs to WIC/MSC committee
 example, several companies were shown to have 20%  and basic chemicals, with the lowest contributions   via email or telephone). Study participants included  members who had a prior relationship with at least
 to 30% of their patents naming at least one female  in engineering.   U.S. TTOs and TTO software application vendors.   one person at the target TTO, and then non-respond-
 inventor, while some companies have less than 5%    While all of these studies and prior work analyzed   ing TTOs were divided up randomly. Follow-up calls
 of their patents naming a woman inventor. This sug-  barriers to female patenting and entrepreneurship   Survey on Gender Tracking  to non-responders were made between November
 gests that individual organizational environments do  rates, many have also indicated a need for additional     An independent survey (WIC/MSC survey) was   2015 and March 2016.
 matter and can influence women’s patenting patterns  tools and resources to better understand and mea-  deployed to determine both baseline data regarding     The WIC/MSC committee member making the
 (20).  sure female participation in the innovation economy.   gender tracking in TTOs and to gain insight about   follow-up call was instructed to engage in two tasks
   There is a strong gender gap in STEM entre-  Recommendations from prior work for increasing   potential barriers keeping TTOs from tracking gen-  with these universities. The first task was to ask the
 preneurship and patenting; across all STEM fields,  women’s patenting activities include developing sys-  der in commercialization-related areas. The initial   original survey questions and enter the results into
 women with doctorate degrees have lower rates of  tems and data tools to better track gender (8). Our   WIC/MSC survey consisted of five questions:   an Excel template. The second task had WIC/MSC
 patenting and entrepreneurship than do men, with  study is an initial analysis on such systems and tools.   committee members share several talking points to
 women STEM doctorates engaging in both activ-  1.  On behalf of which university or organization   advocate and prompt additional discussions around
 ities at lower rates (5.4% versus 7%, respectively)  METHODOLOGY  are you responding?   implementing gender tracking at the target school.
 (21). Influencing all of this is the ongoing issue     The following sections outline the specific aspects   2.  Does your university technology transfer office   These advocacy talking points included:
 with women entering and staying in STEM fields.   of the research methodology, including research   currently track gender for inventors?   1.  How to start tracking gender if interested in
 Illustrating this point, “[i]n 2010, only 19.1% of   questions, research design, sampling strategy, and   3.  If your university technology transfer office     starting to do so and sharing resources devel-
 engineering degrees, 20.9% of computer science,   data collection process as well as the data analysis   does not currently track gender, why not?    oped by WIC/MSC
 and 38.7% of degrees in the physical sciences were   strategy and validity and implications techniques   4.  If your university is not currently tracking   2.  Informing the TTO that gender-related ques-
 awarded to women, whereas 58.3% of degrees in   that were undertaken.  gender for inventors, would you be willing to     tions will be included on the upcoming AUTM
 the biological sciences were held by women” (8).   speak with someone from our committee about     2016 survey in order to encourage the TTO to
 Women in STEM are concentrated in the life sci-  Purpose of the Study  implementing this?     begin tracking and possibly back entering data
 ences, which do not produce as many patentable     The purpose of this study was three-fold: to   5.  If you answered yes to question #4 and would     for the past year or two
 inventions as do fields such as engineering and com-  uncover how TTOs are incorporating gender con-  like us to contact you or someone in your   3.  Emphasize that tracking gender should not
 puter science. Hunt et al. (18) estimate that gender   siderations into their reporting activities, to increase   department, please include contact information     place additional burden on a department once
 segregation across STEM fields accounts for 31% of   awareness about the importance of gender tracking     Questions were designed to understand the cur-    implemented
 the commercial patenting gap and that gender seg-  for those who have not considered gender impact,   rent practices of university TTOs regarding gender   4.  Include any relevant anecdotal data for refer-
 regation in specific job tasks explains at least 13% of   and finally to increase the number of university TTOs   tracking as well as obtain the referent information     ence regarding barriers to implementing
 the commercialized patenting gap. This gender gap   tracking gender. This investigative study was guided   (university name and optional contact informa-    tracking
 becomes more pronounced in positions where a great   by the following questions:  tion for follow-up call). The survey also offered   5.  Ask which software the TTO office was using
 amount of experience is required (6). Women are   an opportunity for the respondents to have a fol-
 also less likely than men to work in patent-intensive   1.  What is the availability of data on participa-   low-up conversation to learn more about gender    Separate follow-up calls were also made to uni-
 jobs, including research, development, and design.     tion rates at academic institution TTOs regarding   monitoring and tracking in TTOs. The survey was  versities that responded to the initial survey and had
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34