Page 84 - T-I JOURNAL19 4
P. 84

732                             FECHNER & SHAPANKA



      assistance for women starting small businesses. The  nondiscrimination laws are fully enforced and that
      National Science Foundation, National Institutes  employment and staffing decisions in academia,
      of Health, and White House Office of Science  industry, and government are made on their merits
      and Technology Policy all have the resources and  and not based on gender, race, or other character-
      expertise to help promote diversity in invention and  istics. It is also essential to promote paid family and
      entrepreneurship across industries and disciplines  medical leave and work-life balance to ensure that
      through grant-making, education, and policy rec-  everyone can contribute to the innovation economy
      ommendations to the White House and Congress.   while participating fully in both their personal and
        Congress and the USPTO can also directly reduce  professional lives.
      some disparities in patenting. For example, Congress
      and the USPTO can unilaterally lower the high costs  THE ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE OF CLOSING
      associated with patenting that create barriers to entry.  PATENTING GAPS
      High fees associated with filing and defending a pat-    The under-representation of women, people of
      ent can pose a substantial barrier since people from  color, and lower-income individuals in the patent
      under-represented groups earn less, on average, than  system presents both a social and an economic chal-
      white men (21). Attorney fees alone for filing a patent  lenge. In addition to failing to funnel large swaths of
      application can cost $5,000 to $16,000, excluding  society into the innovation pipeline, persistent gen-
      other associated costs (22). Programs like the USPTO  der, race, and income gaps result in the U.S. foregoing
      Pro Bono Assistance Program, which matches  the opportunity for substantial economic growth and
      qualified low-income applicants with volunteer  job creation.
      patent attorneys, and the USPTO Pro Se Assistance    The benefits of closing the gap are tangible—and
      Program, which provides advice to inventors who  significant. For example, one study found that “elim-
      wish to pursue patents without the help of an attorney,  inating the patenting shortfall of female holders of
      can help to mitigate the high costs of patenting an  science and engineering degrees would increase GDP
      invention, but they could be expanded to help small  per capita by 2.7%” (8). Another study found that
      businesses and others for whom attorneys’ fees are a  including more women and African Americans in
      major barrier to entry.                     the “initial stage of the process of innovation” would
        Congress should also maintain a strong patent  increase GDP somewhere between 0.64 percent and
      system to help people from under-represented com-  3.3 percent per capita (10).
      munities invent and patent. A strong patent system    In addition to the specific GDP potential, the
      will help women and inventors of color license their  patent gaps are depressing new business creation,
      inventions for a fair return and secure capital sup-  job growth, and innovation. Structural barriers that
      port for their businesses. Over three-quarters of VC  result in lower participation in patenting activities
      investors report that they consider patents in funding  by segments of the U.S. population erect another
      determinations (23). However, women, people of  barrier to entry in business and entrepreneurship.
      color, and lower-income individuals have less access  For example, a report by the Center for Equitable
      to capital associated with start-up success. To the  Growth found that the rising inequality in the pat-
      extent that inventors from under-represented com-  ent system is linked to the decline in the number of
      munities can more easily obtain and defend their  new start-ups in the U.S. economy and the decline
      innovations, they can access additional funding to  in the number of new innovations (25). Noting that
      grow their businesses, expand employment, and com-  firms younger than five years old made up only 39
      mercialize their innovations for public use.  percent of all businesses in the U.S. just before the
        Finally, discrimination against women and people  Great Recession, the report points to lower patenting
      of color in the workplace, cultural inertia in aca-  rates among low-income individuals to underscore
      demia and industry, and gender and racial stereotypes  “just how far out of reach entrepreneurial success is
      all contribute to the patent gaps. Policy efforts to  for the vast majority of children born into low-income
      promote equality in innovation must ensure that  families in the U.S.” (24).
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89