Page 80 - REV T-I JOURNAL INTERIOR ISSUU 18 2-3

156 HIGHSMITH ET AL.

U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of the prosthetic knees. J Prosthet Orthot. 2012;24:10-5.
Army, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or any 8. Hafner BJ, Willingham LL, Buell NC, Allyn KJ,
academic or health care institution. Authors declare Smith DG. Evaluation of function, performance,
no conflicts of interest. This project was funded by: and preference as transfemoral amputees transi-
1. The Florida High Tech Corridor/USF CON- tion from mechanical to microprocessor control
NECT (USF Grant #FHT 10-26). of the prosthetic knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2. Otto Bock Healthcare (USF Grant #6140101200). 2007;88:207-17.
3. The National Institutes of Health Scholars 9. Highsmith MJ. Microprocessor knees: consid-
in Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) grant erations for accommodation and training. J
(1K30RR22270). Prosthet Orthot. 2013;25:60-4.
10. Hillman SJ, Donald SC, Herman J, McCurrach
E, McGarry A, Richardson AM, Robb JE.
REFERENCES Repeatability of a new observational gait score
1. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lura DJ, Lewandowski for unilateral lower limb amputees. Gait Posture.
AL, Quillen WS, Kim SH. Stair ascent and ramp 2010;32:39-45.
gait training with the Genium knee. Technol 11. O’Connor CM, Thorpe SK, O’Malley MJ,
Innov. 2014;15(4):349-58. Vaughan CL. Automatic detection of gait events
2. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lura DJ, Dubey RV, using kinematic data. Gait Posture. 2007;25:469-
Carey SL, Quillen WS, Mengelkoch LJ. Short and 74.
mid-distance walking and posturography with 12. Cappozzo A, Cappello A, Della Croce U,
a novel microprocessor knee. Technol Innov. Pensalfini F. Surface-marker cluster design cri-
2014;15(4):359-68. teria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction.
3. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Miro RM, Lura D, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44:1165-74.
Dubey RV, Carey SL, Quillen WS, Mengelkoch 13. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini
LJ. Perceived differences between the Genium A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD,
and the C-Leg microprocessor prosthetic knees Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I,
in prosthetic-related function and quality of life. Standardization and Terminology Committee
Technol Innov. 2014;15(4):369-75. of the International Society of Biomechanics. ISB
4. Bellmann M, Schmalz T, Ludwigs E, Blumentritt recommendation on definitions of joint coordi-
S. Stair ascent with an innovative microproces- nate system of various joints for the reporting
sor-controlled exoprosthetic knee joint. Biomed of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and
Tech. 2012;57:435-44. spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J
5. Bellmann M, Schmalz T, Ludwigs E, Blumentritt Biomech. 2002;35:543-8.
S. Immediate effects of a new micropro- 14. Cohen J, editor. Statistical power analysis for
cessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a the behavioral sciences. 2 ed. Hillsdale(NJ):
nd
comparative biomechanical evaluation. Arch Erlbaum; 1988.
Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:541-9. 15. Buhi ER, Goodson P, Neilands TB. Out of sight,
6. Lura DJ, Wernke MM, Carey SL, Kahle JT, Miro not out of mind: strategies for handling missing
RM, Highsmith MJ. Differences in knee flexion data. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32:83-92.
between the Genium and C-Leg microprocessor 16. Kenward MG, Molenberghs G. Last observation
knees whil walking on level ground and ramps. carried forward: a crystal ball? J Biopharm Stat.
Clinical Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:175- 2009;19:872-88.
81. 17. Kaufman KR, Levine JA, Brey RH, Iverson BK,
7. Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Lewandowski AL, Kim McCrady SK, Padgett DJ, Joyner MJ. Gait and
SH, Mengelkoch LJ. A method for training step- balance of transfemoral amputees using pas-
over-step stair descent gait with stance yielding sive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled