Page 163 - ssr_16
P. 163

5.2.1. Provide details of the programme-wise success rate of College for the last four
                   years.  How  does  College  compare  itself  with  the  performance  of  other
                   autonomous Colleges/Universities if possible?

                   The  success  rate  is  presented  in  Tables  5.5  and  5.6  below.  Since  College  is
                   autonomous and has a syllabi and curriculum of its own, it is difficult to compare the
                   Institution with other colleges.


                   5.2.2. Providing the percentage of students progressing to higher education or
                   employment (in the last four batches), highlight the observed trends.

                   College is oriented towards encouraging students to pursue academics and the trend
                   has been that nearly fifty percent of our students pursue higher education either in
                   College or in other institutions. Many students get admission to reputed institutes and
                   many prefer to go abroad for their education.

                                  Table 5.4: Student Progressing to Higher Education
                 Student Progression                          %
                 UG to PG                                     50%
                 PG to M. Phil.                               5%
                 PG to PhD                                    3-4%
                 Employed - Campus Selection                  Students  often  seek  additional  education
                    -  Other than Campus selection            before employment

                   5.2.3. What is the Programme-wise completion rate/dropout rate within the time
                   span as stipulated by College/University?

                   College has put in efforts to reduce dropout rates and increase pass percentages by
                   executing  several  measures  such  as  offering  bridge  courses,  remedial  classes,
                   individual attention, peer teaching and assigning postgraduate students  to teach the
                   academically weaker students. However, it has not been the policy to reduce dropout
                   rates by reducing academic rigour. Many undergraduate students drop out in the first
                   year itself as they would have secured admission in some other course of their choice,
                   usually professional courses.

                                 Table 5.5:  Result Statistics - Undergraduate Courses
                         Courses           2009    -  2010 – 13  2011 - 14    2012 - 15    2013 - 16
                                           12
                  1.        HEP            57.81      63.04       53.85       36.76        49.23
                   2.       EPS            73.02      66.04       46.88       57.83        57.3
                   3.       IES            63.24      60.61       68.06       63.16        61.11
                   4.       PCM            64.44      54.76       48.28       68.57        52.54
                   5.       PEM            70         40          58.62       55.56        37.84
                   6.       PMC            73.33      68.85       46.94       63.27        59.02
                   7.       MEC            66.67      58.7        52.78       42.5         54.35
                   8.       EMS            --         52.17       75          71.43        71.43
                   9.       CBZ            62.5       64.29       51.72       72.73        75.68
                   10.  CEB                50         14.29       41.67       66.67        88.89



                                                           158
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168