Page 46 - FALL GUIDELINES MOH 2019
P. 46

FALLS AUDIT TOOLS (Refer to Appendix 4)

         Audit tools should be designed to assess the flow of care and the adherence of staff to falls
         intervention practices.

         FITs in each facility must decide which elements require auditing.

         In measuring key practices, data can be obtained from a number of sources.  Each approach
         has its strengths and limitations:
           Direct observation of care (where a trained observer determines, for example, whether
            a patient‘s call bell or walking aid is within reach) will be the most accurate approach for
            certain care processes, but this can be time consuming.
           Surveys may be helpful in certain circumstances,  but rely  on staff members’ recall of
            specific events, which might be inaccurate.
           Review  of medical  records  is  the  easiest approach  to  complete,  but rely  on what is
            documented in the records (and much care for fall prevention may not be documented).


         AUDITORS

         Ideally an auditor should:
           Be someone familiar with falls intervention processes, the forms used and the overall
            chart layout
           The audit should ideally be carried out by an external party
           Not audit their own work
           Have  some training  or guidance provided (to ensure consistency  in application of
            organization-specific criteria).



























                                          43




                                          43
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51