Page 34 - alligood 8th edition_Neat
P. 34

CHAPTER 2  History and Philosophy of Science  15

           (Brown, 1977). Although philosophy has been docu-  additional  research  is  conducted  or  modifications
           mented as an activity for 3000 years, formal science   are made in the theory and further tests are devised;
           is  a  relatively  new  human  pursuit  (Brown,  1977;   otherwise,  the  theory  is  discarded  in  favor  of  an
           Foucault, 1973). Scientific activity has only recently   alternative explanation (Gale, 1979; Zetterberg, 1966).
           become the object of investigation.           Popper (1962) argued that science would evolve more
             Two  competing  philosophical  foundations  of  sci-  rapidly through the process of conjectures and refuta-
           ence,  rationalism  and  empiricism,  have  evolved  in    tions by devising research in an attempt to refute new
           the  era  of  modern  science  with  several  variations.    ideas. For example, his point is simple; you can never
           Gale  (1979)  labeled  these  alternative  epistemologies   prove that all individuals without social support have
           as centrally concerned with the power of reason and   frequent  rehospitalizations  since  there  might  be  one
           the power of sensory experience. Gale noted similarity   individual  that  presents  with  no  rehospitalization.  A
           in  the  divergent  views  of  science  in  the  time  of  the    single person with no social support that does not have
           classical  Greeks.  For  example,  Aristotle  believed  that   a readmission disproves the theory that all individuals
           advances in biological science would develop through   with  a  lack  of  social  support  have  hospital  readmis-
           systematic  observation  of  objects  and  events  in  the   sions.  From  Popper’s  perspective,  “research  consists
           natural world, whereas Pythagoras believed that knowl-  of generating general hypotheses and then attempting
           edge of the natural world would develop from mathe-  to refute them” (Lipton, 2005, p. 1263). So the hypoth-
           matical reasoning (Brown, 1977; Gale, 1979).  esis  that  a  lack  of  social  support  results  in  hospital
             Nursing  science  has  been  characterized  by  two   readmission is the phenomena of interest to be refuted.
           branching philosophies of knowledge as the discipline   The rationalist view is most clearly evident in the
           developed. Various terms are utilized to describe these   work of Einstein, the theoretical physicist, who made
           two  stances:  empiricist  and  interpretive,  mechanistic   extensive use of mathematical equations in developing
           and holistic, quantitative and qualitative, and deductive   his theories. The theories Einstein constructed offered
           and  inductive  forms  of  science.  Understanding  the   an imaginative framework, which has directed research
           nature of these philosophical stances facilitates appre-  in numerous areas (Calder, 1979). As Reynolds (1971)
           ciation  for  what  each  form  contributes  to  nursing   noted, if someone believes that science is a process of
           knowledge.                                    inventing descriptions of phenomena, the appropriate
                                                         strategy  for  theory  construction  is  the  theory-then-
           Rationalism                                   research strategy. In Reynolds’ view, “as the continuous
           Rationalist epistemology (scope of knowledge) empha-  interplay between theory construction (invention) and
           sizes  the  importance  of  a  priori  reasoning  as  the   testing with empirical research progresses, the theory
           appropriate method for advancing knowledge. A priori   becomes more precise and complete as a description
           reasoning  utilizes  deductive  logic  by  reasoning  from   of nature and, therefore, more useful for the goals of
           the  cause  to  an  effect  or  from  a  generalization  to  a    science” (Reynolds, 1971, p. 145).
           particular instance. An example in nursing is to reason
           that a lack of social support (cause) will result in hos-  Empiricism
           pital  readmission  (effect).  This  causal  reasoning  is  a    The empiricist view is based on the central idea that
           theory until disproven. The traditional approach pro-  scientific knowledge can be derived only from sensory
           ceeds by explaining hospitalization with a systematic   experience (i.e., seeing, feeling, hearing facts). Francis
           explanation  (theory)  of  a  given  phenomenon  (Gale,   Bacon  (Gale,  1979)  received  credit  for  popularizing
           1979). This conceptual system is analyzed by address-  the basis for the empiricist approach to inquiry. Bacon
           ing the logical structure of the theory and the logical   believed that scientific truth was discovered through
           reasoning  involved  in  its  development.  Theoretical    generalizing observed facts in the natural world. This
           assertions  derived  by  deductive  reasoning  are  then   approach, called the inductive method, is based on the
           subjected  to  experimental  testing  to  corroborate  the   idea that the collection of facts precedes attempts to
           theory.  Reynolds  (1971)  labeled  this  approach  the   formulate generalizations, or as Reynolds (1971) called
           theory-then-research  strategy.  If  the  research  findings   it,  the  research-then-theory  strategy.  One  of  the  best
           fail  to  correspond  with  the  theoretical  assertions,    examples to demonstrate this form of logic in nursing
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39